On 01/29/2015 06:35 PM, Burton, Ross wrote:
>
> On 29 January 2015 at 10:10, Nicolas Dechesne 
> <nicolas.dechesne@linaro.org <mailto:nicolas.dechesne@linaro.org>> wrote:
>
>     well, i am not sure this is right... at least probably not the right
>     argument. oe-core is not meant to be tied to specific intel stable
>     releases, whether it is about content or  schedule..
>
>     i would believe our goal is to provide the most recent stable release
>     instead. so that each OE (well, Yocto) release ends up with the most
>     recent versions.
>
>     fwiw, for the boards/platforms i care about, 10.4.3 would be fine.
>
>
> Agreed.  The Intel driver release is tested with 10.4.0 but 10.4.3 is 
> a newer point release so should work, and Intel's aim of ensuring that 
> the latest driver stack is supported doesn't trump having the latest 
> upstream releases in oe-core.
>
> If it turns out that 10.4.3 is critically broken with the Intel driver 
> then *meta-intel* can ship 10.4.0.
>
> Please re-submit this with 10.4.3 instead of 10.4.0.
>
mesa_git bb will keep sync the latest version 10.4.3, that's why we keep 
both _git and 10.4.0.
Now all all the version of xorg-video-intel, libdrm, and xserver-xorg 
are the same with Intel Graphic stack 2014 Q4.
So mesa_10.4.0 will make a stable and verified solution here,
and _git version will make the latest version here.

Pengyu

> Ross