From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail1.windriver.com (mail1.windriver.com [147.11.146.13]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D83860024 for ; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 01:51:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hca.corp.ad.wrs.com [147.11.189.40]) by mail1.windriver.com (8.14.9/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t0U1pJNN028342 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 29 Jan 2015 17:51:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from yu.wr (128.224.163.160) by ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.174.1; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 17:51:18 -0800 Message-ID: <54CAE393.2020605@windriver.com> Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 09:51:15 +0800 From: Pengyu Ma User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Burton, Ross" , Nicolas Dechesne References: <1422435425-20620-1-git-send-email-pengyu.ma@windriver.com> <54CA05D4.6040404@windriver.com> In-Reply-To: X-Originating-IP: [128.224.163.160] Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [V2][PATCH] mesa: Upgrade to 10.4.0 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 01:51:28 -0000 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------070808080305020108010603" --------------070808080305020108010603 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 01/29/2015 06:35 PM, Burton, Ross wrote: > > On 29 January 2015 at 10:10, Nicolas Dechesne > > wrote: > > well, i am not sure this is right... at least probably not the right > argument. oe-core is not meant to be tied to specific intel stable > releases, whether it is about content or schedule.. > > i would believe our goal is to provide the most recent stable release > instead. so that each OE (well, Yocto) release ends up with the most > recent versions. > > fwiw, for the boards/platforms i care about, 10.4.3 would be fine. > > > Agreed. The Intel driver release is tested with 10.4.0 but 10.4.3 is > a newer point release so should work, and Intel's aim of ensuring that > the latest driver stack is supported doesn't trump having the latest > upstream releases in oe-core. > > If it turns out that 10.4.3 is critically broken with the Intel driver > then *meta-intel* can ship 10.4.0. > > Please re-submit this with 10.4.3 instead of 10.4.0. > mesa_git bb will keep sync the latest version 10.4.3, that's why we keep both _git and 10.4.0. Now all all the version of xorg-video-intel, libdrm, and xserver-xorg are the same with Intel Graphic stack 2014 Q4. So mesa_10.4.0 will make a stable and verified solution here, and _git version will make the latest version here. Pengyu > Ross --------------070808080305020108010603 Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
On 01/29/2015 06:35 PM, Burton, Ross wrote:

On 29 January 2015 at 10:10, Nicolas Dechesne <nicolas.dechesne@linaro.org> wrote:
well, i am not sure this is right... at least probably not the right
argument. oe-core is not meant to be tied to specific intel stable
releases, whether it is about content or  schedule..

i would believe our goal is to provide the most recent stable release
instead. so that each OE (well, Yocto) release ends up with the most
recent versions.

fwiw, for the boards/platforms i care about, 10.4.3 would be fine.

Agreed.  The Intel driver release is tested with 10.4.0 but 10.4.3 is a newer point release so should work, and Intel's aim of ensuring that the latest driver stack is supported doesn't trump having the latest upstream releases in oe-core.

If it turns out that 10.4.3 is critically broken with the Intel driver then *meta-intel* can ship 10.4.0.

Please re-submit this with 10.4.3 instead of 10.4.0.

mesa_git bb will keep sync the latest version 10.4.3, that's why we keep both _git and 10.4.0.
Now all all the version of xorg-video-intel, libdrm, and xserver-xorg are the same with Intel Graphic stack 2014 Q4.
So mesa_10.4.0 will make a stable and verified solution here,
and _git version will make the latest version here.

Pengyu

Ross

--------------070808080305020108010603--