From: Pengyu Ma <pengyu.ma@windriver.com>
To: Nicolas Dechesne <nicolas.dechesne@linaro.org>
Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [V2][PATCH] mesa: Upgrade to 10.4.0
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 15:56:34 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54CB3932.2090308@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAP71Wjxk0XFr5L6YL55GBUeGkx0q+dyh1fw245qi7O7j7gJE9w@mail.gmail.com>
On 01/30/2015 03:51 PM, Nicolas Dechesne wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 2:51 AM, Pengyu Ma <pengyu.ma@windriver.com> wrote:
>> mesa_git bb will keep sync the latest version 10.4.3, that's why we keep
>> both _git and 10.4.0.
>> Now all all the version of xorg-video-intel, libdrm, and xserver-xorg are
>> the same with Intel Graphic stack 2014 Q4.
>> So mesa_10.4.0 will make a stable and verified solution here,
>> and _git version will make the latest version here.
>>
> i think you missed the point. you cannot justify the need for 10.4.0
> because it is the 'prefered' Intel version. the policy is that we
> provide in OE-core the most recent stable releases of upstream
> components. when/if I need a specific version of mesa (or anything
> else) for my project, i have a recipe in my own project layer, but
> OE-core is agnostic to that.
>
> now, if a specific version of mesa is known to be broken, upstream, or
> in very special circumstances, we might want to not use it... but that
> isn't the case here, especially since both Ross and I are asking you
> to upgrade to 10.4.3..
>
> if you don't submit 10.4.3, someone else will anyways. and actually i
> have submitted a libdrm upgrade yesterday which is likely to be merged
> soon..
Understood, but there are 2 version mesa_xxx.bb and mesa_git.bb.
Is there any reason why keep two versions?
If I updated mesa_xxx.bb to 10.4.3, it will be the same as mesa_git.bb.
Regards,
Pengyu
>
> cheers
> nicolas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-30 7:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-28 8:57 [V2][PATCH] mesa: Upgrade to 10.4.0 Pengyu Ma
2015-01-29 9:53 ` Nicolas Dechesne
2015-01-29 10:05 ` Pengyu Ma
2015-01-29 10:10 ` Nicolas Dechesne
2015-01-29 10:35 ` Burton, Ross
2015-01-30 1:51 ` Pengyu Ma
2015-01-30 7:51 ` Nicolas Dechesne
2015-01-30 7:56 ` Pengyu Ma [this message]
2015-01-30 8:02 ` Nicolas Dechesne
2015-01-30 9:05 ` Richard Purdie
2015-01-30 9:12 ` Pengyu Ma
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54CB3932.2090308@windriver.com \
--to=pengyu.ma@windriver.com \
--cc=nicolas.dechesne@linaro.org \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox