From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernelconcepts.de (mail.kernelconcepts.de [212.60.202.196]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2228B6E678 for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2015 12:50:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.2.134] by mail.kernelconcepts.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1YIcwN-0001U3-QO; Tue, 03 Feb 2015 13:50:51 +0100 Message-ID: <54D0C433.50705@kernelconcepts.de> Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 13:50:59 +0100 From: Florian Boor User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Burton, Ross" References: <1422873041-19803-1-git-send-email-florian.boor@kernelconcepts.de> <54D0C0B1.1090500@kernelconcepts.de> In-Reply-To: Cc: Otavio Salvador , Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [PATCH] base.bbclass: Use bb.warn instead of bb.error for deprecation notification. X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 12:51:01 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi Ross, On 03.02.2015 13:40, Burton, Ross wrote: > bb.error is fatal, so it's all good right? last time I checked (some days ago) it was not necessarily fatal. I was able to build complete image collecting a pile of PR_INC errors. That's what confused me... I'll check if I still have the log on another machine later. Greetings Florian -- The dream of yesterday Florian Boor is the hope of today Tel: +49 271-771091-15 and the reality of tomorrow. Fax: +49 271-771091-19 [Robert Hutchings Goddard, 1904] florian.boor@kernelconcepts.de http://www.kernelconcepts.de/en