From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.windriver.com (mail.windriver.com [147.11.1.11]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B101465CD0 for ; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 12:21:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ALA-HCB.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hcb.corp.ad.wrs.com [147.11.189.41]) by mail.windriver.com (8.14.9/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t2HCLDw7025868 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 17 Mar 2015 05:21:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from server.local (128.224.20.209) by ALA-HCB.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.41) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.224.2; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 05:21:13 -0700 Message-ID: <55081C38.9080901@windriver.com> Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 08:21:12 -0400 From: Bruce Ashfield User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Burton, Ross" References: <1cd7d6881e747b3458140e34d7801141b0ae62d1.1426525757.git.bruce.ashfield@windriver.com> In-Reply-To: Cc: OE-core Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] kernel-yocto: split meta data generation from patching phase X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 12:21:15 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 2015-03-17 2:52 AM, Burton, Ross wrote: > > On 16 March 2015 at 19:27, Bruce Ashfield > wrote: > > - createme ${createme_flags} ${ARCH} ${machine_branch} > + createme -v -v ${createme_flags} ${ARCH} ${machine_branch} > > > Was adding -v -v intentional? It was. The extra output only goes to the logs, and it is helpful in diagnosing problems. .. and yes, the obvious follow up is that I should have put that in the commit message! Bruce > > Ross