From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail1.windriver.com (mail1.windriver.com [147.11.146.13]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0486260034 for ; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 02:16:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hca.corp.ad.wrs.com [147.11.189.40]) by mail1.windriver.com (8.14.9/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t2J2G5Bk024341 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 18 Mar 2015 19:16:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [128.224.162.236] (128.224.162.236) by ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.224.2; Wed, 18 Mar 2015 19:16:05 -0700 Message-ID: <550A3162.6050701@windriver.com> Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 10:16:02 +0800 From: ChenQi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?windows-1252?Q?An=EDbal_Lim=F3n?= , Paul Eggleton References: <003afa4a3acb0670e6e3b9d3e12e9b276f03876c.1426670089.git.Qi.Chen@windriver.com> <5575166.bgVZKFq0RH@peggleto-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com> <55099DF2.70809@linux.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <55099DF2.70809@linux.intel.com> X-Originating-IP: [128.224.162.236] Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] rootfs.py: two changes regarding log checking X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 02:16:05 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 03/18/2015 11:46 PM, Aníbal Limón wrote: > Hi Paul, Chen, > > Days ago i sent a patchset for handle INCOMPATIBLE_LICENSE in manifest > creation [1] that contains > a rewrite of license_manifest_creation from shell to python, i mean > now these warnings appears. > > Also i sent a similar patches like Chen's ones to avoid warnings > [2][3], You said (Paul) that packagegroups > should not have files, how we can address these case to avoid license > warnings in packagegroups? > Hi Alimon, Paul suggested to skip checking if the package contains no file, because in such case the license is not relevant as long as the final image is concerned. I will send out a new patchset using the above approach. Best Regards, Chen Qi > Cheers, > alimon > > [1] > http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2015-March/102684.html > [2] > http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2015-March/102683.html > [3] > http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2015-March/102682.html > > On 18/03/15 03:48, Paul Eggleton wrote: >> On Wednesday 18 March 2015 17:16:10 Chen Qi wrote: >>> 1. Extend the regular expression to also catch '^WRARNING:' in >>> _log_check_warn. Warnings from bb.note or bbnote begin with >>> 'WARNING:'. So >>> if we decide to catch warnings at rootfs time, we should not ignore >>> those >>> produced by the build system itself. >> FYI, I still have an unfinished patchset to ensure bbwarn calls from >> shell >> functions get piped through to BitBake's event system, with the >> result that >> such warnings actually get logged and displayed by the BitBake UI. (That >> doesn't mean this patch shouldn't go in in the mean time, though.) >> >> Cheers, >> Paul >> > > >