Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] bzip2: remove bzip2-dev from PACKAGES

[Robert Yang <liezhi.yang@windriver.com>]

On 04/08/2015 10:10 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
>
>> On Apr 7, 2015, at 6:55 PM, Robert Yang <liezhi.yang@windriver.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 04/08/2015 09:34 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Apr 7, 2015, at 5:58 AM, Robert Yang <liezhi.yang@windriver.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> There should be only one dev package which is libbz2-dev, so remove
>>>> bzip2-dev.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Robert Yang <liezhi.yang@windriver.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> meta/recipes-extended/bzip2/bzip2_1.0.6.bb |    3 ++-
>>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-extended/bzip2/bzip2_1.0.6.bb b/meta/recipes-extended/bzip2/bzip2_1.0.6.bb
>>>> index ed12277..d1d1c8d 100644
>>>> --- a/meta/recipes-extended/bzip2/bzip2_1.0.6.bb
>>>> +++ b/meta/recipes-extended/bzip2/bzip2_1.0.6.bb
>>>> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ SRC_URI[md5sum] = "00b516f4704d4a7cb50a1d97e6e8e15b"
>>>> SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "a2848f34fcd5d6cf47def00461fcb528a0484d8edef8208d6d2e2909dc61d9cd"
>>>>
>>>> PACKAGES =+ "libbz2 libbz2-dev libbz2-staticdev"
>>>> +PACKAGES_remove = "bzip2-dev bzip2-staticdev”
>>>
>>> why remove ${PN}-dev ? others should be removed IMO
>>
>>
>> I think that it had added libbz2-dev was because debian/ubuntu uses
>> libbz2-dev, the similar to xz.
>
> we have rpm and opkg hats as well.

OK, I will remove libbz2-dev as you and RP preferred.

// Robert

>
>
>