From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail1.windriver.com (mail1.windriver.com [147.11.146.13]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D4E8736BA for ; Wed, 8 Apr 2015 09:05:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hca.corp.ad.wrs.com [147.11.189.40]) by mail1.windriver.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t3895G16005561 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 8 Apr 2015 02:05:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [128.224.162.174] (128.224.162.174) by ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.40) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.224.2; Wed, 8 Apr 2015 02:05:16 -0700 Message-ID: <5524EF4B.8040405@windriver.com> Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2015 17:05:15 +0800 From: Robert Yang User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jussi Kukkonen References: <7c8475e9f21581916595d0ef7d587ce3ec1614a9.1428405830.git.liezhi.yang@windriver.com> <1428442765.14020.482.camel@linuxfoundation.org> <55249123.6090008@windriver.com> In-Reply-To: Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/10] glib-2.0: 2.42.1 -> 2.44.0 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2015 09:05:23 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 04/08/2015 03:42 PM, Jussi Kukkonen wrote: > On 8 April 2015 at 05:23, Robert Yang wrote: >> On 04/08/2015 05:39 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: >>> This blew up badly on the autobuilder: >>> >>> http://errors.yoctoproject.org/Errors/Search/?items=10&query=c8da6d7390ad626c03d5b9b431a97adeaeb60a89 >> >> Sorry, the failures are on CentOS 6.6, please ignore this upgrade atm, I >> will >> find a CentOS 6.x to fix the problem. > > That's typedef redefinition (C11 feature and supported by gcc for > quite a while). Why does CentOS specifically choke on that? > > Anyway, upstream has decided to roll this back: apparently some gcc > versions that are still in use do not support the feature. > GLib commit 4a292721bc should help. Thank you very much, I will backport it to fix the problem. // Robert > > Jussi > >