Openembedded Core Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com>
To: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>, <openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Cc: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>,
	Koen Kooi <koen@dominion.thruhere.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] kernel: Build uImage only when really needed
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 14:43:48 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <553FD4E4.3000900@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1430239116-7671-9-git-send-email-marex@denx.de>

On 2015-04-28 12:38 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> Build the uImage file using the kernel build system only when
> it is really required, which is only in case KEEPUIMAGE == yes.
> Otherwise, just build zImage, since the Yocto build system will
> handle the uImage generation for us.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
> Cc: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
> Cc: Koen Kooi <koen@dominion.thruhere.net>
> Cc: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
> Cc: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com>
> ---
>   meta/classes/kernel-uimage.bbclass | 8 ++++++++
>   1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/meta/classes/kernel-uimage.bbclass b/meta/classes/kernel-uimage.bbclass
> index ce8f96f..acde9ae 100644
> --- a/meta/classes/kernel-uimage.bbclass
> +++ b/meta/classes/kernel-uimage.bbclass
> @@ -6,6 +6,14 @@ python __anonymous () {
>           depends = d.getVar("DEPENDS", True)
>           depends = "%s u-boot-mkimage-native" % depends
>           d.setVar("DEPENDS", depends)
> +
> +	# Override KERNEL_IMAGETYPE_FOR_MAKE variable, which is internal
> +	# to kernel.bbclass . We override the variable here, since we need
> +	# to build uImage using the kernel build system if and only if
> +	# KEEPUIMAGE != yes. Otherwise, we pack compressed vmlinux into
> +	# the uImage .


I keep reading this, and must be inverting the logic in my head.

If we've set KEEPUIMAGE = yes, that means we just want to let the
kernel build the uImage and perform no extra generation steps.

When I read this, it looks like if I set the keep flag, I'll be
overriden to build a zImage. Is that intentional ? I'd think we
would have just left it alone or set it to uImage (unless we
are saying that everyone should be building zImage now .. but
I know some old ppc targets that do want to build uImages).

Bruce

> +	if d.getVar("KEEPUIMAGE", True) == 'yes':
> +            d.setVar("KERNEL_IMAGETYPE_FOR_MAKE", "zImage")
>   }
>
>   do_uboot_mkimage() {
>



  reply	other threads:[~2015-04-28 18:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-04-28 16:38 [PATCH 0/8] Add basic fitImage support Marek Vasut
2015-04-28 16:38 ` [PATCH 1/8] kernel: Clean up KERNEL_IMAGETYPE_FOR_MAKE Marek Vasut
2015-04-28 16:38 ` [PATCH 2/8] kernel: Rework do_uboot_mkimage Marek Vasut
2015-04-28 16:38 ` [PATCH 3/8] kernel: Pull out the linux.bin generation Marek Vasut
2015-04-28 16:38 ` [PATCH 4/8] kernel: Pull uImage generation into separate class Marek Vasut
2015-04-28 18:44   ` Bruce Ashfield
2015-04-28 21:16     ` Marek Vasut
2015-05-04 21:41       ` Marek Vasut
2015-05-12 14:15         ` Paul Eggleton
2015-05-12 15:38           ` Bruce Ashfield
2015-05-12 16:18             ` Paul Eggleton
2015-05-12 19:27               ` Marek Vasut
2015-05-12 20:57                 ` Paul Eggleton
2015-05-12 22:18                   ` Marek Vasut
2015-05-12 22:27                     ` Paul Eggleton
2015-05-13  7:17                       ` Marek Vasut
2015-04-28 16:38 ` [PATCH 5/8] kernel: Separate out uboot_prep_kimage Marek Vasut
2015-04-28 16:38 ` [PATCH 6/8] kernel: Build DTBs early Marek Vasut
2015-04-28 16:38 ` [PATCH 7/8] kernel: Add basic fitImage support Marek Vasut
2015-04-28 16:38 ` [PATCH 8/8] kernel: Build uImage only when really needed Marek Vasut
2015-04-28 18:43   ` Bruce Ashfield [this message]
2015-04-28 21:15     ` Marek Vasut
2015-04-28 18:45 ` [PATCH 0/8] Add basic fitImage support Bruce Ashfield
2015-04-28 20:06   ` Marek Vasut

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=553FD4E4.3000900@windriver.com \
    --to=bruce.ashfield@windriver.com \
    --cc=koen@dominion.thruhere.net \
    --cc=marex@denx.de \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    --cc=paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox