Re: WARNING: The license listed CLOSED was not in the licenses collected for foo

[Mike Looijmans <mike.looijmans@topic.nl>]

What is one expected to do when one justs wants to add the missing license to 
the "licenses collected for ..."?

I'm a bit spoiled now, most OE messages explain what it expects me to do to 
fix the problem.

M.

On 08-05-15 14:39, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> Hi Steffen,
>
> On Friday 08 May 2015 13:07:35 Steffen Sledz wrote:
>> Since switching from dizzy to fido we've some warnings related to some of
>> our own closed source packages.
>>
>> WARNING: log_check: There is a warn message in the logfile
>> WARNING: log_check: Matched keyword: [WARNING:]
>> WARNING: log_check: WARNING: The license listed CLOSED was not in the
>> licenses collected for foo
>>
>> The recipes contain lines like this one:
>>
>> LICENSE = "CLOSED"
>>
>> How should we fix the recipe to avoid the warning?
>
> I think the part of the code that produces this warning probably should be
> ignoring the CLOSED value. Can I ask you to please file a bug? Feel free to add
> me on CC.
>
> Cheers,
> Paul
>



Kind regards,

Mike Looijmans
System Expert

TOPIC Embedded Products
Eindhovenseweg 32-C, NL-5683 KH Best
Postbus 440, NL-5680 AK Best
Telefoon: +31 (0) 499 33 69 79
Telefax: +31 (0) 499 33 69 70
E-mail: mike.looijmans@topicproducts.com
Website: www.topicproducts.com

Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail