From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx6-out12.antispamcloud.com (mx6-out12.antispamcloud.com [95.211.2.203]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6855673F92 for ; Mon, 11 May 2015 09:39:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 100-208.ftth.onsbrabantnet.nl ([88.159.208.100] helo=TOP-EX01.TOPIC.LOCAL) by mx6.antispamcloud.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1YrkBE-0004JX-1T; Mon, 11 May 2015 11:39:33 +0200 Received: from [192.168.80.121] (192.168.80.121) by TOP-EX01.TOPIC.LOCAL (192.168.10.102) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.224.2; Mon, 11 May 2015 11:39:56 +0200 Message-ID: <555078C6.8060504@topic.nl> Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 11:39:18 +0200 From: Mike Looijmans Organization: TOPIC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Eggleton References: <554C98F7.5090005@dresearch-fe.de> <55505221.7030002@topic.nl> <55506F1F.2010100@topic.nl> <3739437.GgmXEBs0pQ@peggleto-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <3739437.GgmXEBs0pQ@peggleto-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com> X-Originating-IP: [192.168.80.121] X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: 9833cda7-5b21-4d34-9a38-8d025ddc3664 X-EXCLAIMER-MD-BIFURCATION-INSTANCE: 0 X-Filter-ID: s0sct1PQhAABKnZB5plbIbbvfIHzQjPVmPLZeVYSu3xU9luQrU+8/8qthi+0Jd/W6KAUC/fjyuDn NXFr4uarw2qn2YSnBaxCIAHbc091Tc1/63A71K+jqMokMNyfk/ad6zUhnDUpwAEsjGnc8y38ChhW DHFYc6XC0Haiqey5b0Mem3nkaZsJp+9zNJIzCkmTgXL9qeKKSbhrpb+MxK8KTsoRCHWk1Bdz6Hse hols1KpTxt8FK0syZM78Ip6XMJKSfL5junl+tCQpHoIobEB6qRxwEiTVJqDh0qKoKsXx5lloNsmI 4zkZpjdC8gHubQGDdouipYwvlCdK/kDYpLB7T4vduhfZSzngB36Mec7tIi+5wToVUfL2hBxUuJV4 Ohp2YP6FGNtYJtETLuTCxSz05FVf1j1twZRpZmNePd8yD6I6Ybr/niDNrurllrQAWzPoUXGuwfRo HqMy2rdpD/o7aL1SnB0ZCWCwMAM8t66oUbA7gjbBVOyhsORmDMrIe9fEUK+dxh2q6zh2e9Okajud 8n+PMPiZjKSjZ1VNR7yvyldknRDjH7QY7Fm+gQ0M40rBZ/1pGTzmZ0qF0Y/hB/T9Bi4yXI38RNP4 PjTJnPO/3my57IUNtZsmYlZe2TrEPH/IrGySGi76i1XI3JQnDkzKf09fZ1Xwxex+WCZ5ozYSk2IB IkUL/j1Y48GvmeURQjjEXMxXxDbOxcvksZxP4sFbpkqcLUIH/vDKOylcRAj4cYjEfO0bMqOtAx3x ZnuhrzR5+fqc2NN0cYZYS6gAxA6h/Q== X-Report-Abuse-To: spam@mx99.antispamcloud.com X-Filter-Fingerprint: IFrWXGses7OKB5S5G8/dJXhXyDRoOQM5J3kcUr0HrMvJUWjZ8+qhjyB23tbDuyLOYL8Ff78gYsez 4Rl08xudmXi4esCQ0R1MchVjt7wblGlvhFgW0MjUMRkF5sMCDfftTXNFDzN17hnrWeZYOJvLq0Ic WjZ+XcEjj/7Pkld0zkmvziDInX9WdMov2kn2yXjdwv61T+KDYyYtREgszdyFwv8IxCB3p/oCKvxr eyISh3JGb7OS5oVgiO+kDxZrVPLz3MmEGC2PrUKqLq5WmHK+Nw== X-Originating-IP: 88.159.208.100 X-Spampanel-Domain: topic.nl X-Spampanel-Username: 88.159.208.100 Authentication-Results: antispamcloud.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=88.159.208.100@topic.nl X-Spampanel-Outgoing-Class: ham X-Spampanel-Outgoing-Evidence: Combined (0.05) X-Recommended-Action: accept Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: WARNING: The license listed CLOSED was not in the licenses collected for foo X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 09:39:37 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =EF=BB=BFOn 11-05-15 11:36, Paul Eggleton wrote: > At a guess, maybe do_populate_lic didn't re-execute for this recipe. Does= it > still happen if you bitbake -c cleansstate the recipe and try again? Yes, it even complains about this on a completely fresh build. > > Cheers, > Paul > > On Monday 11 May 2015 10:58:07 Mike Looijmans wrote: >> Hmm, I cannot figure it out... I have in a recipe: >> >> LICENSE =3D "internal" >> LIC_FILES_CHKSUM =3D "file://LICENSE;md5=3Dcf85de037de7ae12cc2d0059741fd= bae" >> >> Then in my layer.conf: >> >> LICENSE_PATH +=3D "${LAYERDIR}/licenses" >> >> I have a file called "internal" in that path. Still, I get: >> >> WARNING: log_check: WARNING: The license listed internal was not in the >> licenses collected for ... >> >> What am I missing still then? What does the warning mean? I thought I go= t >> everything right, but either the licensing rules have changed or I never= got >> it right in the first place and a check was added to make me aware of th= at. >> On 11-05-15 08:54, Mike Looijmans wrote: >>> What is one expected to do when one justs wants to add the missing lice= nse >>> to the "licenses collected for ..."? >>> >>> I'm a bit spoiled now, most OE messages explain what it expects me to d= o >>> to >>> fix the problem. >> >> Kind regards, >> >> Mike Looijmans >> System Expert >> >> TOPIC Embedded Products >> Eindhovenseweg 32-C, NL-5683 KH Best >> Postbus 440, NL-5680 AK Best >> Telefoon: +31 (0) 499 33 69 79 >> Telefax: +31 (0) 499 33 69 70 >> E-mail: mike.looijmans@topicproducts.com >> Website: www.topicproducts.com >> >> Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail > Kind regards, Mike Looijmans System Expert TOPIC Embedded Products Eindhovenseweg 32-C, NL-5683 KH Best Postbus 440, NL-5680 AK Best Telefoon: +31 (0) 499 33 69 79 Telefax: +31 (0) 499 33 69 70 E-mail: mike.looijmans@topicproducts.com Website: www.topicproducts.com Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail