Re: [RFC] Add something like bitbake -cmenuconfig <recipe> ?

[Robert Yang <liezhi.yang@windriver.com>]

On 05/17/2015 05:34 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-05-15 at 10:35 +0800, Robert Yang wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Is is useful/possible if we add something like bitbake <recipe> -cmenuconfig,
>> just like kernel's make menuconfig ?
>>
>> We can use the menuconfig to config the vars such as MACHINE, DL_DIR,
>> DISTRO_FEATURES, MACHINE_FEATURES and all the variables which are
>> configurable, I think that this would help the newbie a lot.
>>
>> I think that we can add a menuconfig.bbclass (or other names) to do this,
>> and I'd like to work on it.
>
> Why would you want to specify a <recipe> when configuring MACHINE? I
> understand why you're thinking this but it isn't well thought out and in
> this form would confuse users more than help them.
>
> I don't think the system will even parse without a valid MACHINE, let
> alone execute tasks.

Hi RP,

I meant that we need something to help configure the build easier, it
can generate something like local.conf.append, not configure the recipe.

The example "bitbake <recipe> -cmenuconfig" wasn't right enough, it's
just a rough thought, we can use the current default local.conf
(MACHINE = qemux86) to make system parse.

The problem is that we have many bbclasses in oe-core, a lot of them
has specify configurations, and also a lot of vars in the conf file such
as bitbake.conf, it's not easy to know how and what to config, especially,
for newbies. The "bitbake -cmenuconfig" maybe not a good idea, I think that
we need something to help config the build (generate local.conf) easier,
do you have any suggestions, please ?

// Robert

>
> Cheers,
>
> Richard
>
>
>