Openembedded Core Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gary Thomas <gary@mlbassoc.com>
To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] systemd-serialgetty: Remove SERIAL_CONSOLE definition, because it depends of machine definition. Set it, here, can be make the value is not good.
Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 07:28:25 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <555F2EF9.10506@mlbassoc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2176018.53hRFMtF2v@peggleto-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com>

On 2015-05-22 07:12, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> On Friday 22 May 2015 15:02:02 Thomas PERROT wrote:
>> If the machine layer definition is applied after meta-systemd also
>> with a default setting operator instead an affectation, this var will
>> be bad initialized. It's the case with meta-raspberrypi layer.
>
> 1) Where in meta-systemd is SERIAL_CONSOLE being set? I can't find it anywhere
> in there.

It's actually in OE-core:
   meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd-serialgetty.bb

>
> 2) Should you even be using meta-systemd? systemd support in OE-Core is 99%
> complete; meta-systemd is mostly only needed for legacy usages.
>
> 3) When the machine configuration sets the value, that happens pretty early on
> in the parsing process so there's no way that this value is going to take
> precedence over the machine value. Have you looked at the output of
> bitbake -e systemd-serialgetty | less to see how the value of this variable is
> being set?

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------
Gary Thomas                 |  Consulting for the
MLB Associates              |    Embedded world
------------------------------------------------------------


  reply	other threads:[~2015-05-22 13:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-22 10:09 [PATCH] systemd-serialgetty: Remove SERIAL_CONSOLE definition, because it depends of machine definition. Set it, here, can be make the value is not good Thomas Perrot
2015-05-22 11:11 ` Otavio Salvador
2015-05-22 13:02   ` Thomas PERROT
2015-05-22 13:12     ` Paul Eggleton
2015-05-22 13:28       ` Gary Thomas [this message]
2015-05-22 13:32         ` Paul Eggleton
2015-05-22 13:57           ` Gary Thomas
2015-05-22 13:58       ` Thomas PERROT
2015-05-22 14:06         ` Paul Eggleton
2015-05-22 14:27           ` Thomas PERROT
2015-05-22 14:32             ` Paul Eggleton
2015-05-22 15:20               ` Thomas PERROT
2015-05-22 17:02                 ` Thomas PERROT
2015-05-22 13:08   ` Gary Thomas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=555F2EF9.10506@mlbassoc.com \
    --to=gary@mlbassoc.com \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox