From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.windriver.com (mail.windriver.com [147.11.1.11]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AC977324E for ; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 02:38:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hca.corp.ad.wrs.com [147.11.189.40]) by mail.windriver.com (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPS id t512cbI7015452 (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Sun, 31 May 2015 19:38:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [128.224.162.200] (128.224.162.200) by ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.40) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.224.2; Sun, 31 May 2015 19:38:37 -0700 Message-ID: <556BC5AB.3040705@windriver.com> Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2015 10:38:35 +0800 From: Robert Yang User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Richard Purdie References: <9267553a2f080dfb2fac0522df25346195b831fa.1432805258.git.liezhi.yang@windriver.com> <1432906592.404.138.camel@linuxfoundation.org> In-Reply-To: <1432906592.404.138.camel@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/9] btrfs-tools: 3.18.2 -> 4.0.1 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2015 02:38:38 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 05/29/2015 09:36 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 02:57 -0700, Robert Yang wrote: >> * Updated fix-parallel.patch >> * inherit autotools-brokensep, the autotools doesn't work: >> | make: *** No rule to make target `ctree.o', needed by `btrfs'. Stop. >> >> Signed-off-by: Robert Yang >> --- >> .../btrfs-tools/btrfs-tools/fix-parallel.patch | 16 ++++++++-------- >> .../btrfs-tools/btrfs-tools_git.bb | 16 +++++++++------- >> 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) > > Did upstream switch to autotools for 4.x? If so, this should really be > mentioned in the commit message to make sense of the changes. Yes, it does, I will send an updated patch for it. // Robert > > Cheers, > > Richard > > >