From: akuster808 <akuster808@gmail.com>
To: "Burton, Ross" <ross.burton@intel.com>,
OE-core <openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>,
openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: Future of Qt4 recipes
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 16:13:13 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5589E809.8060000@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJTo0LaKEvtznsdfz8gLWFSLyb6Rx2XsgbYG_cfOrAm+W2UfEg@mail.gmail.com>
On 06/22/2015 03:43 AM, Burton, Ross wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So, Qt 4.8.7 was released last month[1]. Support for Qt4 stops at the
> end of 2015, and 4.8.7 is planned to be the last ever release of Qt4.
> It's still mandated by the long-awaited LSB 5 but I think it's fair to
> say that the majority of developers have moved to Qt5. So, what should
> we do with Qt4 moving forward?[2] I see several options:
>
> 1) There's still lots of people using Qt4 in production, please keep it
> in oe-core! (and revisit in six months time)
> 2) Move Qt4 recipes and classes to a meta-qt4 layer now so that oe-core
> 1.9 ships without Qt4, and anyone wanting full LSB compliance or Qt4
> will need to add that layer to their distro.
>
> Personally, I vote for (2). Any other comments?
#2 sounds fine.
would recipes-lsb move out to its own layer too?
- Armin
>
> Ross
>
> [1] https://blog.qt.io/blog/2015/05/26/qt-4-8-7-released/
> [2] https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7812
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-23 23:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-22 10:43 Future of Qt4 recipes Burton, Ross
2015-06-22 14:27 ` Otavio Salvador
2015-06-22 21:48 ` Florian Boor
2015-06-22 21:58 ` Philip Balister
2015-06-22 22:14 ` Burton, Ross
2015-06-22 22:50 ` Philip Balister
2015-06-23 23:13 ` akuster808 [this message]
2015-06-24 0:26 ` Martin Jansa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5589E809.8060000@gmail.com \
--to=akuster808@gmail.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=ross.burton@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox