From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail1.windriver.com (mail1.windriver.com [147.11.146.13]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A6F9605D2 for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 09:32:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hca.corp.ad.wrs.com [147.11.189.40]) by mail1.windriver.com (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPS id t5P9WlcF020541 (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 25 Jun 2015 02:32:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [128.224.162.200] (128.224.162.200) by ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.40) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.224.2; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 02:32:47 -0700 Message-ID: <558BCABE.609@windriver.com> Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 17:32:46 +0800 From: Robert Yang User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Burton, Ross" References: <558B6646.2050809@windriver.com> In-Reply-To: Cc: OE-core Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] file: 5.22 -> 5.23 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 09:32:47 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 06/25/2015 05:06 PM, Burton, Ross wrote: > > On 25 June 2015 at 03:24, Robert Yang > wrote: > > It works now, I think that it should be a transient failure. And I think that > it is still the best source location since it is suggested by the homepage. > > > $ wget ftp://ftp.astron.com/pub/file/file-5.23.tar.gz > --2015-06-25 09:58:02-- ftp://ftp.astron.com/pub/file/file-5.23.tar.gz > => ‘file-5.23.tar.gz’ > Resolving ftp.astron.com (ftp.astron.com > )... 38.117.134.18 > Connecting to ftp.astron.com (ftp.astron.com > )|38.117.134.18|:21... connected. > Logging in as anonymous ... > Login incorrect. > > Still doesn't work for me. Anyway, 5.23 is moderately broken (long options > don't work) so we probably want to wait for 5.24 or take the patch from upstream. Thanks, let's wait for 5.24. Btw, it doesn't work for me now, either, now. // Robert > > Ross