From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.windriver.com (mail.windriver.com [147.11.1.11]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C13D75F7C for ; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 15:47:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hca.corp.ad.wrs.com [147.11.189.40]) by mail.windriver.com (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPS id t6KFlE40025934 (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 20 Jul 2015 08:47:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Marks-MacBook-Pro-2.local (172.25.36.226) by ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.235.1; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 08:47:13 -0700 To: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov References: <1435759342-5312-1-git-send-email-dbaryshkov@gmail.com> <559D1AD2.3050305@windriver.com> From: Mark Hatle Organization: Wind River Systems Message-ID: <55AD1800.20706@windriver.com> Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 10:47:12 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Fix builds for MIPS64 N32 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 15:47:18 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Between customer escalations, other work and vacation.. I didn't happen. I've started testing it this morning and should have results tomorrow.. (US time). --Mark On 7/20/15 7:11 AM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote: > 2015-07-08 15:42 GMT+03:00 Mark Hatle : >> On 7/8/15 7:00 AM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> 2015-07-01 17:02 GMT+03:00 Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov : >>>> Quite simple configuration (MIPS64 N32 image) fails to build (see below). >>>> I have verified these patches in both single lib and in multilib cases. >>>> Tri-lib images and SDK for MIPS build fine with these patches. >>> >>> Any comments on this patchset? It would be nice to have N32 ubroken in >>> the current >>> master tree. >> >> Sorry, I'm traveling right now and haven't had time to review this. I should be >> able to get back to the office and test it by the end of the week. >> >> I visually reviewed the patches and I don't object to them going in -- but I'm >> still not sure they are all correct. > > Re-ping. I'd like to receive a confirmation from you (and thus get the > patches merged) > or to discuss, what seems wrong to you. > >> >> --Mark >> >>>> >>>> Current situation: >>>> >>>> lumag@nexs:~/OE$ MACHINE=qemumips64n32 bitbake core-image-base >>>> NOTE: Started PRServer with DBfile: >>>> /home/lumag/OE/cache/prserv.sqlite3, IP: 127.0.0.1, PORT: 46391, PID: >>>> 15895 >>>> Loading cache: 100% >>>> |########################################################################################################################| >>>> ETA: 00:00:00 >>>> Loaded 1302 entries from dependency cache. >>>> NOTE: Resolving any missing task queue dependencies >>>> ERROR: Nothing RPROVIDES 'binutils-cross-canadian-mips64' (but >>>> /home/lumag/OE/sources/openembedded-core/meta/recipes-core/packagegroups/packagegroup-cross-canadian.bb >>>> RDEPENDS on or otherwise requires it) >>>> NOTE: Runtime target 'binutils-cross-canadian-mips64' is unbuildable, >>>> removing... >>>> Missing or unbuildable dependency chain was: ['binutils-cross-canadian-mips64'] >>>> NOTE: Runtime target 'packagegroup-cross-canadian-qemumips64n32' is >>>> unbuildable, removing... >>>> Missing or unbuildable dependency chain was: >>>> ['packagegroup-cross-canadian-qemumips64n32', >>>> 'binutils-cross-canadian-mips64'] >>>> ERROR: Required build target 'core-image-base' has no buildable providers. >>>> Missing or unbuildable dependency chain was: ['core-image-base', >>>> 'packagegroup-cross-canadian-qemumips64n32', >>>> 'binutils-cross-canadian-mips64'] >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> > > >