From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail1.windriver.com (mail1.windriver.com [147.11.146.13]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AFAB762DB for ; Tue, 28 Jul 2015 07:53:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ALA-HCB.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hcb.corp.ad.wrs.com [147.11.189.41]) by mail1.windriver.com (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPS id t6S7rFUM000064 (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for ; Tue, 28 Jul 2015 00:53:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [128.224.162.200] (128.224.162.200) by ALA-HCB.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.41) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.235.1; Tue, 28 Jul 2015 00:52:59 -0700 Message-ID: <55B734EA.8050903@windriver.com> Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 15:53:14 +0800 From: Robert Yang User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: About upgrade a package to a Release Candidate version (RCX) X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 07:53:15 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello, Is it a good idea to upgrade a package to a Release Candidate version, such as RC1, RC2 and so on ? I think no because: 1) Maybe the RC version is not stable enough. 2) Maybe the package's final version doesn't release when oe-core/meta-oe releases, I think that use an older but stable version is better than new RC version usually. -- Thanks Robert