From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.windriver.com (mail.windriver.com [147.11.1.11]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A67E75A60 for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2015 14:58:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hca.corp.ad.wrs.com [147.11.189.40]) by mail.windriver.com (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPS id t6TEwqDX000591 (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 29 Jul 2015 07:58:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Marks-MacBook-Pro-2.local (172.25.36.226) by ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.235.1; Wed, 29 Jul 2015 07:58:34 -0700 To: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov References: <1435759342-5312-1-git-send-email-dbaryshkov@gmail.com> <559D1AD2.3050305@windriver.com> <55AD1800.20706@windriver.com> <55AE57D8.3040205@windriver.com> <55AE64AD.8060406@windriver.com> From: Mark Hatle Organization: Wind River Systems Message-ID: <55B8EA2B.3080408@windriver.com> Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 09:58:51 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Fix builds for MIPS64 N32 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 14:58:56 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 7/28/15 12:26 PM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote: > 2015-07-21 18:26 GMT+03:00 Mark Hatle : >> On 7/21/15 9:31 AM, Mark Hatle wrote: >>> On 7/21/15 3:23 AM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> 2015-07-20 18:47 GMT+03:00 Mark Hatle : >>>>> Between customer escalations, other work and vacation.. I didn't happen. >>>> >>>> No problem, really. I just wanted to be sure that the patches aren't going >>>> to be lost. >>>> >>>>> >>>>> I've started testing it this morning and should have results tomorrow.. (US time). >>>> >>>> Thank you very much! >>> >>> With master and the four patches I got an error trying to construct the SDK. >>> >>> I'm still investigating the error: >>> >>> Collected errors: >>> * satisfy_dependencies_for: Cannot satisfy the following dependencies for >>> packagegroup-cross-canadian-qemumips64: >>> * gcc-cross-canadian-mips * binutils-cross-canadian-mips * >>> gdb-cross-canadian-mips * >>> * opkg_install_cmd: Cannot install package packagegroup-cross-canadian-qemumips64. >>> >>> >>> My configuration for this particular test was: >>> >>> (oe-init-build-env stock w/ the following changes) >> >> I've narrowed down the reproducer to just: >> >> MACHINE = "qemumips64" >> require conf/multilib.conf >> DEFAULTTUNE = "mips64-n32" >> MULTILIBS = "" >> >> (If you remove the require conf/multilib.conf then things work.) >> >> I'm going to continue to investigate. > > Any progress on your side? As I failed to reproduce the issue on my side, > could you please specify: > 1) what is the exact bitbake command that failed? > 2) what additional layers do you have enabled in your build? > 3) is it a cleanroom build, or you have an sstate cache populated with previous > build results? > 4) any additional information that I can use to reproduce the issue on my side? Recent check-ins have changed some things. The compile side was working for a while, but not the compilation side (using it). I've been working with RP on IRC, and he's come up with some additional patches. (including this set of 4..) So I think the set is fine, it's up to the other pieces that need to mesh with this to produce the working SDK. --Mark >> >> --Mark >> >>> MACHINE = "qemumips64" >>> >>> require conf/multilib.conf >>> DEFAULTTUNE = "mips64-n32" >>> MULTILIBS = "multilib:lib64 multilib:lib32" >>> DEFAULTTUNE_virtclass-multilib-lib64 = "mips64" >>> DEFAULTTUNE_virtclass-multilib-lib32 = "mips32r2" >>> >>> # Set RPM_PREFER_ELF_ARCH to configure preferred ABI when using rpm packaging >>> # backend to generate a rootfs, choices are: >>> # 1: ELF32 wins >>> # 2: ELF64 wins >>> # 4: ELF64 N32 wins (for mips64 or mips64el only) >>> RPM_PREFER_ELF_ARCH = "4" >>> >>> >>>>> >>>>> --Mark >>>>> >>>>> On 7/20/15 7:11 AM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote: >>>>>> 2015-07-08 15:42 GMT+03:00 Mark Hatle : >>>>>>> On 7/8/15 7:00 AM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote: >>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 2015-07-01 17:02 GMT+03:00 Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov : >>>>>>>>> Quite simple configuration (MIPS64 N32 image) fails to build (see below). >>>>>>>>> I have verified these patches in both single lib and in multilib cases. >>>>>>>>> Tri-lib images and SDK for MIPS build fine with these patches. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Any comments on this patchset? It would be nice to have N32 ubroken in >>>>>>>> the current >>>>>>>> master tree. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Sorry, I'm traveling right now and haven't had time to review this. I should be >>>>>>> able to get back to the office and test it by the end of the week. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I visually reviewed the patches and I don't object to them going in -- but I'm >>>>>>> still not sure they are all correct. >>>>>> >>>>>> Re-ping. I'd like to receive a confirmation from you (and thus get the >>>>>> patches merged) >>>>>> or to discuss, what seems wrong to you. >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> --Mark >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Current situation: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> lumag@nexs:~/OE$ MACHINE=qemumips64n32 bitbake core-image-base >>>>>>>>> NOTE: Started PRServer with DBfile: >>>>>>>>> /home/lumag/OE/cache/prserv.sqlite3, IP: 127.0.0.1, PORT: 46391, PID: >>>>>>>>> 15895 >>>>>>>>> Loading cache: 100% >>>>>>>>> |########################################################################################################################| >>>>>>>>> ETA: 00:00:00 >>>>>>>>> Loaded 1302 entries from dependency cache. >>>>>>>>> NOTE: Resolving any missing task queue dependencies >>>>>>>>> ERROR: Nothing RPROVIDES 'binutils-cross-canadian-mips64' (but >>>>>>>>> /home/lumag/OE/sources/openembedded-core/meta/recipes-core/packagegroups/packagegroup-cross-canadian.bb >>>>>>>>> RDEPENDS on or otherwise requires it) >>>>>>>>> NOTE: Runtime target 'binutils-cross-canadian-mips64' is unbuildable, >>>>>>>>> removing... >>>>>>>>> Missing or unbuildable dependency chain was: ['binutils-cross-canadian-mips64'] >>>>>>>>> NOTE: Runtime target 'packagegroup-cross-canadian-qemumips64n32' is >>>>>>>>> unbuildable, removing... >>>>>>>>> Missing or unbuildable dependency chain was: >>>>>>>>> ['packagegroup-cross-canadian-qemumips64n32', >>>>>>>>> 'binutils-cross-canadian-mips64'] >>>>>>>>> ERROR: Required build target 'core-image-base' has no buildable providers. >>>>>>>>> Missing or unbuildable dependency chain was: ['core-image-base', >>>>>>>>> 'packagegroup-cross-canadian-qemumips64n32', >>>>>>>>> 'binutils-cross-canadian-mips64'] >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> > > >