From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.windriver.com (mail.windriver.com [147.11.1.11]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9487C76419 for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2015 07:40:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ALA-HCB.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hcb.corp.ad.wrs.com [147.11.189.41]) by mail.windriver.com (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPS id t6U7eLSx012093 (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 30 Jul 2015 00:40:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [128.224.162.176] (128.224.162.176) by ALA-HCB.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.41) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.235.1; Thu, 30 Jul 2015 00:40:02 -0700 Message-ID: <55B9D4E3.1010305@windriver.com> Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 15:40:19 +0800 From: wenzong fan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Burton, Ross" References: <1438155256-3385-1-git-send-email-wenzong.fan@windriver.com> In-Reply-To: Cc: OE-core Subject: Re: [PATCH] bjam-native: inhibit sysroot strip X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 07:40:22 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 07/29/2015 06:19 PM, Burton, Ross wrote: > > On 29 July 2015 at 08:34, > wrote: > > +# bjam is already stripped, don't strip it again > +INHIBIT_SYSROOT_STRIP = "1" > > > In case it's even needed to debug bjam-native, how hard would it be to > stop bjam from being stripped in the first place? By default, a release version is stripped, we could build & install the debug version for bjam. For specific changes, we only need to append "--debug" to build.sh, then update do_install() to select the unstripped version. Do you think this is the right ways? Thanks Wenzong > > Ross