From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [192.55.52.115]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41FF4763F2 for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2015 15:11:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 30 Jul 2015 08:11:28 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.15,577,1432623600"; d="scan'208";a="758474516" Received: from kanavin-desktop.fi.intel.com (HELO [10.237.68.143]) ([10.237.68.143]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 30 Jul 2015 08:11:27 -0700 Message-ID: <55BA3EDD.4030600@linux.intel.com> Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 18:12:29 +0300 From: Alexander Kanavin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Martin Jansa References: <0c7f8aaf4b04cf1bb866dae6af21509af051fbe6.1438262915.git.alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com> <20150730142900.GB2457@jama> In-Reply-To: <20150730142900.GB2457@jama> Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/26] libproxy: update SRC_URI to not use Google Code X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 15:11:28 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 07/30/2015 05:29 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: >> -SRC_URI = "http://libproxy.googlecode.com/files/libproxy-${PV}.zip \ >> +SRC_URI = "${DEBIAN_MIRROR}/main/libp/${BPN}/${BPN}_${PV}.orig.tar.gz \ >> file://0001-test-Include-sys-select.h-for-select.patch \ >> " >> - >> -SRC_URI[md5sum] = "06be230b8b612e64997f8f15af6373aa" >> -SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "3175abcb49c0b37fd82c697927783bf7d53de3884a8559bc594e59caa09bdb04" >> +SRC_URI[md5sum] = "3cd1ae2a4abecf44b3f24d6639d2cd84" >> +SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "dc3f33de54163718f82b3e7c496a7de97f8862578414b8ecaad3cbfe4821864b" > > Why has debian mirror different checksums? > > Include the diff in commit message and warn premirror maintainers that > they need to drop old file (otherwise it will fail) - which is very > annoying. I guess this is not needed because they are in fact two different filenames/formats? Alex