From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E618765CA for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 12:23:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from orsmga003.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.27]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 31 Jul 2015 05:23:44 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.15,584,1432623600"; d="scan'208";a="616738845" Received: from kanavin-desktop.fi.intel.com (HELO [10.237.68.143]) ([10.237.68.143]) by orsmga003.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 31 Jul 2015 05:23:43 -0700 Message-ID: <55BB690C.5060801@linux.intel.com> Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 15:24:44 +0300 From: Alexander Kanavin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Burton, Ross" References: <86b43671f02c22f328e3801e0711a33731156ba8.1438262915.git.alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com> <20150730143658.GK2457@jama> <55BA4399.2030302@linux.intel.com> In-Reply-To: Cc: OE-core Subject: Re: [PATCH 21/26] systemd: remove PV from the recipe X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 12:23:47 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 07/30/2015 07:25 PM, Burton, Ross wrote: > For the release tag I'd agree with you, but as 219 < 219-stable we can't > just change this now (without adding an epoch, and adding epochs are evil). > > Does the RRS have a way of mapping a PV to something that can be used in > the upstream comparison? I don't really know, but I agree that something like RRS_PV would be good to have (and if it's absent then RRS will fall back to PV of course). Anibal, what's your take? Alex