Openembedded Core Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robert Yang <liezhi.yang@windriver.com>
To: Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com>,
	Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
	<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: About multilib packages rpm pkg name
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2015 14:45:46 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55C1B11A.7060606@windriver.com> (raw)


Hello,

For the multilib package like lib32-bash, its rpm package name
is bash-4.3.30-r0.lib32_x86.rpm, but for ipk and deb, its name is
lib32-bash.ipk and lib32-bash.deb, there is a side effect for
the naming of rpm, for example, if packagegroup-xx rdepends on bash,
the lib32-packagegroup-xx should rdepend on lib32-bash, but
the its rpm pkg knows nothing about lib32-bash, so it still rdepends
on bash, this causes 32bit toolchain libs not installed when export
multilib sdk, for example:

Configured multilib:
MACHINE ?= "qemux86-64"
require conf/multilib.conf
MULTILIBS = "multilib:lib32"
DEFAULTTUNE_virtclass-multilib-lib32 = "x86"

$ bitbake core-image-minimal -cpopulate_sdk

When PACKAGE_CLASSES = "package_rpm",  the lib32-libgcc,
lib32-libgcc-dev or other lib32-xx packages are not installed,
so that the 32bit toolchain doesn't work in SDK, this is because
lib32-packagegroup-core-standalone-sdk-target can't pull in the
lib32-xx correctly.

When PACKAGE_CLASSES = "package_ipk", it works well.

Does anyone why we don't use the name like lib32-bash.rpm, please ?
Can we use lib32-bash, please ?

-- 
Thanks

Robert


             reply	other threads:[~2015-08-05  6:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-08-05  6:45 Robert Yang [this message]
2015-08-05 13:10 ` About multilib packages rpm pkg name Mark Hatle
2015-08-06  2:33   ` Robert Yang
2015-08-06 20:57     ` Mark Hatle
2015-08-07  2:34       ` Robert Yang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55C1B11A.7060606@windriver.com \
    --to=liezhi.yang@windriver.com \
    --cc=mark.hatle@windriver.com \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox