From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [192.55.52.115]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45E9C606E8 for ; Mon, 17 Aug 2015 12:54:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 17 Aug 2015 05:54:47 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.15,694,1432623600"; d="scan'208";a="785616578" Received: from kanavin-desktop.fi.intel.com (HELO [10.237.68.143]) ([10.237.68.143]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 17 Aug 2015 05:54:45 -0700 Message-ID: <55D1D9E7.6070309@linux.intel.com> Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 15:56:07 +0300 From: Alexander Kanavin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Randy MacLeod , openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org, Wenzong Fan References: <8a20f52f97c27d6a37d73962f2c8c2b1ea9fe5a7.1439549437.git.alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com> <55CEC72D.4060702@windriver.com> In-Reply-To: <55CEC72D.4060702@windriver.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 21/22] midori: remove the recipe and replace references to midori with epiphany X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 12:54:46 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 08/15/2015 07:59 AM, Randy MacLeod wrote: >> -# midori depends on webkit-gtk which could not build for mips64 >> -MIDORI = "midori" >> -MIDORI_mips64 = "" >> -MIDORI_mips64n32 = "" >> +# epiphany depends on webkitgtk which could not build for mips64 >> +EPIPHANY = "epiphany" >> +EPIPHANY_mips64 = "" >> +EPIPHANY_mips64n32 = "" > > Mips64 support using the newer webkitgtk may be better. > Wenzong please check on that once this code is in master-next > and reply here. Latest Webkit (2.8.5) actually does build for MIPS64 (where 2.8.4 failed), but I couldn't find a way to test the n32 variant using poky - any suggestions? I'll drop the above lines for now. Alex