From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.windriver.com (mail.windriver.com [147.11.1.11]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0B2875794 for ; Fri, 21 Aug 2015 10:14:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hca.corp.ad.wrs.com [147.11.189.40]) by mail.windriver.com (8.15.2/8.15.1) with ESMTPS id t7LADomh027084 (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 21 Aug 2015 03:13:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [128.224.162.211] (128.224.162.211) by ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.235.1; Fri, 21 Aug 2015 03:13:50 -0700 Message-ID: <55D6F9FC.9020807@windriver.com> Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 18:14:20 +0800 From: ChenQi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Randy MacLeod , Khem Raj , Philip Balister References: <1439787800-21088-1-git-send-email-raj.khem@gmail.com> <5402FBA9-07E4-47CF-983E-E8778B5AE2F6@gmail.com> <55D5D076.5000106@balister.org> <55D682D9.4050902@windriver.com> In-Reply-To: <55D682D9.4050902@windriver.com> X-Originating-IP: [128.224.162.211] Cc: OE-core Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4 V2] systemd: Upgrade 219 -> 224 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 10:14:06 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Khem, I built core-image-minimal for qemuarm64. There's a lot of failures and warnings at boot time and the system boots into rescue mode. And I also verified 199 has no such problem. Best Regards, Chen Qi On 08/21/2015 09:46 AM, Randy MacLeod wrote: > On 2015-08-20 09:17 PM, Khem Raj wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 6:04 AM, Philip Balister >> wrote: >>> On 08/19/2015 10:21 PM, Khem Raj wrote: >>>> On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Burton, Ross >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On 17 August 2015 at 16:41, Khem Raj wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> There are many reasons, for me its overlay support for >>>>>> systemd-nspawn, >>>>>> networkd has got many new features that is now usable w.r.t. IP >>>>>> forwarding, >>>>>> vxlan etc. >>>>>> and it has many bug fixed in those 2000 odd commits since 219, no >>>>>> different then any other package upgrades we do in general it >>>>>> keep the >>>>>> upgrade workload lower as we roll the releases. >>>>>> Any specific concerns ? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Can we get an updated patch with a clearer commit log? >>> >>> I've also heard that as systemd evolves, more binaries are getting >>> added >>> to the base package that should be packaged separately for people >>> interested in small images. I do not have personal experience here, but >>> wanted to pass along the feedback. >>> >>> We should look at buildhistory packaging differences when we do >>> upgrades. >> >> Here is the diff between files in 219 and 224, if you want to know >> more I can paste more info just let me know. >> >> https://gist.github.com/kraj/2a066973a5e5cf83ed24 >> >> sizes have gone up on daemons, no new daemons besides some new >> service files >> and scripts are added >> > > ubu-15.10 will use v224 as well: > http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/daily-live/current/wily-desktop-amd64.manifest > and Arch and a couple other distro are using this version already: > http://pkgs.org/download/systemd > > v224 was released 3 weeks ago: > --- > $ git log -1 v224 > commit b2a0ac5e5b29c73ca7c0da23369a4769d5a91ddd > ... > Date: Fri Jul 31 18:56:38 2015 +0200 > --- > > Khem's summary of the binaries is reassuring given that there > has been lots of churn: > > $ git log --oneline v219..v224 | wc -l > 2167 > $ git diff v219..v224 | diffstat | tail -1 > 1367 files changed, 109907 insertions(+), 166577 deletions(-) > > I'm skimming the NEWS file from 219->224 and I haven't seen > anything that concerns me yet: > https://github.com/systemd/systemd/blob/master/NEWS > Qi, > Please take a closer look at the NEWS file, > review Khem's uprev and build and boot qemuarm64, qemuppc > when you have time. Send partial feedback today even if you > just review the commit and NEWS file. > > Qi may not be able to do that in the next couple of day > due to SDK work. > > Khem, > What testing have you done so far? > Any ptest? > What toolchain version are you building with, btw? > > > It's late in M3 and we still have the kernel and toolchain coming in > but unless we hear of known problems with v224, let's go for it > once the new toolchain and kernel have settled. >