From: Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com>
To: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>,
Jian Liu <jian.liu@windriver.com>
Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sdk.py: fix conflicts of packages
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2015 16:29:01 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55E6189D.90902@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1441141913.24871.17.camel@linuxfoundation.org>
On 9/1/15 4:11 PM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-08-25 at 16:29 +0800, Jian Liu wrote:
>> If packages are conveyed to smart to install at the same time,
>> conflicts will not happen.
>> Try to install packages into sdk image at the same time.
>
> Doesn't smart have an issue where if one package fails to install for
> some reason, others listed in the same command won't be attempted? Did
> you test that?
I believe this was fixed in:
commit cd475aea5f5bc4b6a2dd3e576070a117ae079597
Author: Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com>
Date: Thu Jan 22 16:10:34 2015 -0600
python-smartpm: Fix attemptonly builds when file conflicts occur
[YOCTO #7299]
When file conflicts occur, the RPM transaction aborts. Instead of
simply accepting the failure, we now identify, capture, and remove
the offending package(s) from the transaction and retry.
Signed-off-by: Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
--Mark
> Cheers,
>
> Richard
>
>> This patch is not so perfect. For example,
>> IMAGE_INSTALL += "lib32-ncurses"
>> IMAGE_INSTALL += "ncurses-dev"
>> ncurses-dev and lib32-ncurses-dev will have conflicts during packages installation.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jian Liu <jian.liu@windriver.com>
>> ---
>> sdk.py | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
>> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/meta/lib/oe/sdk.py b/meta/lib/oe/sdk.py
>> index c57a441..7b43a29 100644
>> --- a/meta/lib/oe/sdk.py
>> +++ b/meta/lib/oe/sdk.py
>> @@ -107,10 +107,17 @@ class RpmSdk(Sdk):
>> pm.dump_all_available_pkgs()
>> pm.update()
>>
>> - for pkg_type in self.install_order:
>> - if pkg_type in pkgs_to_install:
>> - pm.install(pkgs_to_install[pkg_type],
>> - [False, True][pkg_type == Manifest.PKG_TYPE_ATTEMPT_ONLY])
>> + pkgs = []
>> + pkgs_attempt = []
>> + for pkg_type in pkgs_to_install:
>> + if pkg_type == Manifest.PKG_TYPE_ATTEMPT_ONLY:
>> + pkgs_attempt += pkgs_to_install[pkg_type]
>> + else:
>> + pkgs += pkgs_to_install[pkg_type]
>> +
>> + pm.install(pkgs)
>> +
>> + pm.install(pkgs_attempt, True)
>>
>> def _populate(self):
>> bb.note("Installing TARGET packages")
>> @@ -184,10 +191,17 @@ class OpkgSdk(Sdk):
>>
>> pm.update()
>>
>> - for pkg_type in self.install_order:
>> - if pkg_type in pkgs_to_install:
>> - pm.install(pkgs_to_install[pkg_type],
>> - [False, True][pkg_type == Manifest.PKG_TYPE_ATTEMPT_ONLY])
>> + pkgs = []
>> + pkgs_attempt = []
>> + for pkg_type in pkgs_to_install:
>> + if pkg_type == Manifest.PKG_TYPE_ATTEMPT_ONLY:
>> + pkgs_attempt += pkgs_to_install[pkg_type]
>> + else:
>> + pkgs += pkgs_to_install[pkg_type]
>> +
>> + pm.install(pkgs)
>> +
>> + pm.install(pkgs_attempt, True)
>>
>> def _populate(self):
>> bb.note("Installing TARGET packages")
>> @@ -260,10 +274,17 @@ class DpkgSdk(Sdk):
>> pm.write_index()
>> pm.update()
>>
>> - for pkg_type in self.install_order:
>> - if pkg_type in pkgs_to_install:
>> - pm.install(pkgs_to_install[pkg_type],
>> - [False, True][pkg_type == Manifest.PKG_TYPE_ATTEMPT_ONLY])
>> + pkgs = []
>> + pkgs_attempt = []
>> + for pkg_type in pkgs_to_install:
>> + if pkg_type == Manifest.PKG_TYPE_ATTEMPT_ONLY:
>> + pkgs_attempt += pkgs_to_install[pkg_type]
>> + else:
>> + pkgs += pkgs_to_install[pkg_type]
>> +
>> + pm.install(pkgs)
>> +
>> + pm.install(pkgs_attempt, True)
>>
>> def _populate(self):
>> bb.note("Installing TARGET packages")
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-01 21:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-25 8:29 [PATCH] sdk.py: fix conflicts of packages Jian Liu
2015-09-01 21:11 ` Richard Purdie
2015-09-01 21:29 ` Mark Hatle [this message]
2015-09-01 21:51 ` Mark Hatle
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-11-11 8:07 Jian Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55E6189D.90902@windriver.com \
--to=mark.hatle@windriver.com \
--cc=jian.liu@windriver.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox