From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 463887702A for ; Wed, 2 Sep 2015 19:39:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 02 Sep 2015 12:39:29 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,455,1437462000"; d="scan'208";a="761067580" Received: from lsandov1-mobl-linux.zpn.intel.com (HELO [10.219.5.40]) ([10.219.5.40]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 02 Sep 2015 12:39:27 -0700 Message-ID: <55E750B8.70107@linux.intel.com> Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2015 14:40:40 -0500 From: Leonardo Sandoval User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Patrick Ohly References: <16f26bbb5fa39e399b185cd26fe9205c2e0cc5d4.1436903712.git.leonardo.sandoval.gonzalez@linux.intel.com> <1440746955.3006.73.camel@intel.com> <55E06356.8000607@linux.intel.com> <1440785288.3006.93.camel@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <1440785288.3006.93.camel@intel.com> Cc: "Stoppa, Igor" , matt.fleming@intel.com, leonardo.sandoval.gonzalez@intel.com, ricardo.neri@intel.com, openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 3/3] runqemu: Define OECORE_MACHINE_SYSROOT on setup_sysroot X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2015 19:39:29 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Patrick these set of patches should be merged into master(next). I do not see any heavy objection doing it. As you mentioned, there are some points to improve but I think the latter can be done before 2.1 release. Let me know if you have any objections, otherwise the merge is pending. On 08/28/2015 01:08 PM, Patrick Ohly wrote: > On Fri, 2015-08-28 at 08:34 -0500, Leonardo Sandoval wrote: >> Hi Patrick, >> >> I do not have much time for a V4 set of patches, but now with all your >> input I can rework V3 patches on 2.1. > > What do you mean with "rework on on 2.1"? > > I have some other runqemu changes pending locally (support booting > hddimg), so runqemu internals are still kinda fresh in my mind. If you > don't have time, then I can rework the patch series. However, it's a > side project for me, too. >