From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx12-05.smtp.antispamcloud.com (mx12-05.smtp.antispamcloud.com [46.165.232.175]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DE2D65C8A for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2015 10:20:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 100-208.ftth.onsbrabantnet.nl ([88.159.208.100] helo=TOP-EX01.TOPIC.LOCAL) by mx12.antispamcloud.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1ZZG0H-0008Qg-FG; Tue, 08 Sep 2015 12:20:00 +0200 Received: from [192.168.80.121] (192.168.80.121) by TOP-EX01.TOPIC.LOCAL (192.168.10.102) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.224.2; Tue, 8 Sep 2015 12:19:19 +0200 Message-ID: <55EEB647.7000101@topic.nl> Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 12:19:51 +0200 From: Mike Looijmans Organization: TOPIC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jussi Kukkonen References: <55963864.2030604@topic.nl> <55ED6393.6050906@topic.nl> <55EDBD6F.7090900@topic.nl> In-Reply-To: X-Originating-IP: [192.168.80.121] X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: 9833cda7-5b21-4d34-9a38-8d025ddc3664 X-EXCLAIMER-MD-BIFURCATION-INSTANCE: 0 X-Filter-ID: s0sct1PQhAABKnZB5plbIbbvfIHzQjPVmPLZeVYSu3xU9luQrU+8/8qthi+0Jd/W6KAUC/fjyuDn NXFr4uarw51tZiJxcjns2SY3j4UJRi6sxOp0+M2PQ1/4TNBB5Ij0w0IL8f1eek8oyUUuBOOAQa8g ejvs5mxBUzg3jVOf3vvmP3xMDswqyQ6mQ6XwvGLsuJVCkJk9TlVS86xgAgZafbHqj5fcgWKFi0cp Vjs6qIsVBRxTXZY5rRjwUCWOgblDtJR2W3sp9iQnl8NFIeJNHiG7X+t1TW39Ja77LGPpOwDOjyd3 oGE1tEOqXHYvZIk4yBUEDKaxNZhQ5w2b7VrnnPRMPeCzA4fvS0eXZ3J8iZshEWyJzIkwSFAW0Pw8 uiKeJ9eX2UhoCOjofuIFDReRUAFSU+YtS5ujHPpGDgHLmNg7cwe96RgJ9LTG/qMdWsI692PNDpgL sd6Ddd/s7VM53o6ccHCldH+5aCvCLfmaIvz3uFL8N7VKh/CG+lj0Rj1mjuG3OyA90NHVTFoNkTji gYIHzgrL8il3sV0dVRVXzjqRVYKU9W9tbmVXJBqdHHDmlFyaiSgCQQ1OadeU0o3KJDNLKZUH8kQv CzH7IKj6sa+/C1cmIkpmMu2y/KVVPaNVuERI/lUckE9oPyvcIhwEMmltkIEyb31pMCMMB0fkaiUf hLP+ssd9qBrF2bUx9HvvbufhCZ7MOWUWpNco+KOrHhgD/FVEY7v4laIdTJ8d+KC4ixWSYWIo3iDq xvNn8MbZG8FV/fQARVcG5/WF9EqvuQ== X-Report-Abuse-To: spam@mx99.antispamcloud.com X-Filter-Fingerprint: IFrWXGses7OKB5S5G8/dJUb3OPwsHaH0Fvg5oXltHd/JUWjZ8+qhjyB23tbDuyLOYL8Ff78gYsez 4Rl08xudmXi4esCQ0R1MchVjt7wblGlvhFgW0MjUMRkF5sMCDfftTXNFDzN17hnrWeZYOJvLq0Ic WjZ+XcEjj/7Pkld0zkmvziDInX9WdMov2kn2yXjdwv61T+KDYyYtREgszdyFwv8IxCB3p/oCKvxr eyISh3JGb7OS5oVgiO+kDxZrVPLz3MmEGC2PrUKqLq5WmHK+Nw== X-Originating-IP: 88.159.208.100 X-Spampanel-Domain: topic.nl X-Spampanel-Username: 88.159.208.100 Authentication-Results: antispamcloud.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=88.159.208.100@topic.nl X-Spampanel-Outgoing-Class: ham X-Spampanel-Outgoing-Evidence: Combined (0.00) X-Recommended-Action: accept Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: Getting rid of "The license listed internal was not in the licenses collected" warnings? X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2015 10:20:06 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =EF=BB=BFOn 08-09-15 10:44, Jussi Kukkonen wrote: > On 7 September 2015 at 19:38, Mike Looijmans > wrote: > > On 07-09-15 13:56, Jussi Kukkonen wrote: > > On 7 September 2015 at 13:14, Mike Looijmans > >= > wrote: > > Just sped another hour or so trying to pinpoint this, but I = cannot > wrap my head around it. What do I have to do to add a licens= e to a > layer without these annoying warnings? > > > I just tried this (with master branch) and it seems to work fine > here... Are you using master or something older? > > > Did you try that in a separate, empty layer? I suspect I'm missing a > variable or directive of some kind which cause it to miss the license= file. > > > I have layer with literally only: > * conf/layer.conf file with just LICENSE_PATH +=3D "${LAYERDIR}/licenses" > * licenses/internal file > This layer is added to BBLAYERS. After this a recipe from another layer s= eems > to be able to use the "internal" license... The warning doesn't appear until you actually build a rootfs with that pack= age=20 in it. > > Do you not get a "${DEPLOY_DIR}/licenses/${BPN}/generic_internal"= file > when you build the recipe for BPN? > > > Nope. Ah, wait, on closer inspection it actually exists, but it's a symlink to so= me=20 none-existing location. Apparently, to save some diskspace and reduce=20 maintenance on text files I linked a few files together. Somehow, the link = got=20 copied instead of the file contents. I un-symlinked the "internal" file, and (together with some forced rebuilds= )=20 that finally made the warning go away. Thanks! Kind regards, Mike Looijmans System Expert TOPIC Embedded Products Eindhovenseweg 32-C, NL-5683 KH Best Postbus 440, NL-5680 AK Best Telefoon: +31 (0) 499 33 69 79 Telefax: +31 (0) 499 33 69 70 E-mail: mike.looijmans@topicproducts.com Website: www.topicproducts.com Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail