From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ig0-f172.google.com (mail-ig0-f172.google.com [209.85.213.172]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2815373232 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2015 11:50:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by igcrk20 with SMTP id rk20so13939951igc.1 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2015 04:50:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=d2F6St7WhSW2X79FTdjWEBF7I2qLMFIlJCbjrTHKVyY=; b=phYcFlVWs6HCtuH8GcUx29cdstHXSGX2eXyWhi26IJ0VWBh2wQPCrQNKzLiV1Ofqxz TgkyCFl0dq0CHR9X8YL2hsqD/+IInOI8A/nDyhJRD/WDGzBZwUiFjWzZVkP9kpu8/WvA HmHvk0rqlH11KRqb+DWN+M536zlXQVrmzU13flUU6gPGUyatfmMKkcr7ieuYsihzg7kG Mfny+FJgLYXLW+WJCSlMqhDflJZa3uDRfgeX5Eh4Oiy4Hv1ir9bGSsLpnn680d+by5lj Ssx1+hW9/q/bWim/3PMAN7NuobS5CxEWPRpwLgqNGs+bcvCh/EkTAiCr0gjzjHKP2C54 dZXA== X-Received: by 10.50.45.33 with SMTP id j1mr5146372igm.61.1441885828564; Thu, 10 Sep 2015 04:50:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.141.85] (dsl-67-55-28-109.acanac.net. [67.55.28.109]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m25sm6891287iod.32.2015.09.10.04.50.27 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 10 Sep 2015 04:50:28 -0700 (PDT) References: <0b794c84466fef2ece1269e01820503b4bce0b52.1441753511.git.raj.khem@gmail.com> <63981.10.252.58.194.1441792979.squirrel@linux.intel.com> <64065.10.252.58.194.1441794205.squirrel@linux.intel.com> <32176B14-814F-40D7-A452-86D835E38FCB@gmail.com> <55F1679C.5090508@linux.intel.com> Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org From: Trevor Woerner Message-ID: <55F16E82.1070708@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 07:50:26 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <55F1679C.5090508@linux.intel.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/16] slang: Fix namespace conflict vis-a-vis posix_close X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 11:50:33 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 09/10/15 07:21, Alexander Kanavin wrote: > On 09/09/2015 07:02 PM, Khem Raj wrote: > >> So I encourage you to formulate a policy and make a proposal to >> community and get everyone on board in changing >> the policy OE wide. > > > Actually, first we need some kind of tool that keeps track of custom > patches and their upstream-statuses and minimizes the amount of manual > work. > > Then we can formulate a policy on top of that: for example, if a patch > has been 'Pending' for 3 months, the person who added it gets a > reminder to update the status; if the patch has been 'Pending' for 6 > months and the patch person has been unresponsive, no more patches are > accepted from that person until he does the upstreaming of the ones he > already got into oe-core. Something like that. With so many maintainers on so many different layers/etc we would need some sort of billboard somewhere listing the names of people currently on the "naughty" list ;-)