Sure Randy, Sending a V2 with correct labeling.CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account!
Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Deepesh, please fix the labeling error and send a v2.
Randy
On Thu, May 1, 2025, 23:26 Khem Raj via lists.openembedded.org <raj.khem=gmail.com@lists.openembedded.org> wrote:
On Thu, May 1, 2025 at 8:15 PM Deepesh Varatharajan
<deepesh.varatharajan@windriver.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 01-05-2025 11:24, Khem Raj wrote:
> > CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account!
> > Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 8:03 PM Varatharajan, Deepesh via
> > lists.openembedded.org
> > <deepesh.varatharajan=windriver.com@lists.openembedded.org> wrote:
> >> From: Deepesh Varatharajan <Deepesh.Varatharajan@windriver.com>
> >>
> >> 3463100f2d x86: Detect Intel Diamond Rapids
> >> e09436c2cb x86: Handle unknown Intel processor with default tuning
> >> 7620d98186 x86: Add ARL/PTL/CWF model detection support
> >> 765ff3d0d4 x86: Optimize xstate size calculation
> >> 65ae73be01 x86: Use `Avoid_Non_Temporal_Memset` to control non-temporal path
> >> 2be36448c4 x86: Tunables may incorrectly set Prefer_PMINUB_for_stringop (bug 32047)
> >> bde201e92c x86: Disable non-temporal memset on Skylake Server
> >> 38a7632f2d x86: Fix value for `x86_memset_non_temporal_threshold` when it is undesirable
> >> cc59fa5dbc x86: Enable non-temporal memset tunable for AMD
> >> 0da58e8be0 x86: Add seperate non-temporal tunable for memset
> >> 837a36c371 x86: Link tst-gnu2-tls2-x86-noxsave{,c,xsavec} with libpthread
> >> 87ab0c7f7f x86: Use separate variable for TLSDESC XSAVE/XSAVEC state size (bug 32810)
> >> 60cd7123a6 x86: Skip XSAVE state size reset if ISA level requires XSAVE
> >> 4cf3f9df54 x86_64: Add atanh with FMA
> >> 01ed435e2e x86_64: Add sinh with FMA
> >> 0edcc77fe7 x86_64: Add tanh with FMA
> >> 7ecf0d3bde x86-64: Exclude FMA4 IFUNC functions for -mapxf
> >> e1fe22368e nptl: clear the whole rseq area before registration
> >> dd8c0c3bbd math: Improve layout of exp/exp10 data
> >> a1b09e59e2 AArch64: Use prefer_sve_ifuncs for SVE memset
> >> d0e2133470 AArch64: Add SVE memset
> >> 0cc12d9c47 math: Improve layout of expf data
> >> 0cd10047bf AArch64: Remove zva_128 from memset
> >> dd1e63ab58 AArch64: Optimize memset
> >> 65a96a6f2b AArch64: Improve generic strlen
> >> 4073e4ee2c AArch64: Improve codegen for SVE logs
> >> 78abd3ef6e AArch64: Improve codegen in SVE tans
> >> a10183b633 AArch64: Improve codegen of AdvSIMD atan(2)(f)
> >> dcd1229e5b AArch64: Improve codegen of AdvSIMD logf function family
> >> 72156cb90b AArch64: Improve codegen in AdvSIMD logs
> >> 5e354bf4e2 AArch64: Simplify rounding-multiply pattern in several AdvSIMD routines
> >> 80df456112 aarch64: Avoid redundant MOVs in AdvSIMD F32 logs
> >> d591876303 aarch64: Fix AdvSIMD libmvec routines for big-endian
> >> f6d48470ae assert: Add test for CVE-2025-0395
> >>
> >> Testresults:
> >> After update |Before update |Difference
> >> PASS: 5068 |PASS: 5072 |PASS: +4
> > +4 should mean more passes after update but the table shows otherwise.
> > Can you list the 4 tests which are passing now ?
> Hi Khem,
>
> Apologies for the confusion, there was a typo. I mistakenly listed the
> 'after update'
> passing test cases under 'before update' and vice versa. The following four
> additional test cases passed after the update:
>
> PASS: assert/tst-assert-sa-2025-0001
> PASS: elf/tst-gnu2-tls2-x86-noxsave
> PASS: elf/tst-gnu2-tls2-x86-noxsavec
> PASS: elf/tst-gnu2-tls2-x86-noxsavexsavec
That looks good. Thanks
>
> Regards,
> Deepesh
> >> FAIL: 120 |FAIL: 120 |FAIL: 0
> >> XPASS: 4 |XPASS: 4 |XPASS: 0
> >> XFAIL: 16 |XFAIL: 16 |XFAIL: 0
> >> UNSUPPORTED: 157|UNSUPPORTED: 157|UNSUPPORTED: 0
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Deepesh Varatharajan <Deepesh.Varatharajan@windriver.com>
> >> ---
> >> meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc-version.inc | 2 +-
> >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc-version.inc b/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc-version.inc
> >> index da9227ccca..040fc793b1 100644
> >> --- a/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc-version.inc
> >> +++ b/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc-version.inc
> >> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
> >> SRCBRANCH ?= "release/2.39/master"
> >> PV = "2.39+git"
> >> -SRCREV_glibc ?= "662516aca8b6bf6aa6555f471055d5eb512b1ddc"
> >> +SRCREV_glibc ?= "3463100f2d47f2897a24ba8023a5c7aaf2d26550"
> >> SRCREV_localedef ?= "fab74f31b3811df543e24b6de47efdf45b538abc"
> >>
> >> GLIBC_GIT_URI ?= "git://sourceware.org/git/glibc.git;protocol=https"
> >> --
> >> 2.43.0
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#215905): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/215905
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/112554022/953399
Group Owner: openembedded-core+owner@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [rwmacleod@gmail.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-