From: Randy MacLeod <randy.macleod@windriver.com>
To: Scott Murray <scott.murray@konsulko.com>
Cc: alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com, stephane.desneux@iot.bzh,
jsmoeller@linuxfoundation.org,
openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org, anuj.mittal@intel.com,
david.zuhn@sonos.com
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] rng-tools: move to meta-oe
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2024 19:45:51 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55fa276d-e6e2-4cc1-b4fa-660356889665@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b8554634-5da9-9872-660a-5e94a62c765e@konsulko.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4127 bytes --]
On 2024-01-15 4:50 p.m., Scott Murray wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Jan 2024, Randy MacLeod via lists.openembedded.org wrote:
>
>> On 2024-01-15 11:58 a.m., Alexandre Belloni via lists.openembedded.org wrote:
>>> This is breaking meta-agl-core until this gets into meta-oe:
>>>
>>> https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/120/builds/3849/steps/14/logs/stdio
>> Thanks Alexandre.
>>
>>
>> Stephane, Jan-Simon,
>>
>> Is rng-tools actually still a requirement for meta-agl ?
>> It was added back in 2018 but the kernel algorithm improved as of 5.6:
>> https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/178518
> The kernel no longer blocking does mean things won't get stuck on boot,
> but it seems like any distro with an eye towards security still needs
> either rngd or haveged present to feed in entropy on hardware that does
> not have a hardware RNG (and potentially even when there is a hardware
> RNG to improve the quality of the pool). We definitely support some
> platforms in AGL that do not have a hardware RNG, so we'll have to work
> out whether we're going to need to eat making meta-oe a hard requirement
> for using meta-agl-core or do something else.
For anyone who missed it...
We restored rng-tools in oe-core as described here:
https://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/?id=828afafb3bff54079fcba9bdab2ec87ac13e4ce6
Scott,
Any news on a qemu/HW boot test case?
Testing randomness is a little different as described in my notes below.
If anyone has some expertise in this area, please help!
There are a few tests in rng-tools, that could be wrapped in ptest:
❯ ls tests/
Makefile.am rngtestjitter.sh rngtesturandom.sh rngtestzero.sh
I haven't played with rngtest much but I was wondering how we'd even
construct a test of randomness that would *always* pass.
The example below shows that if you run runtest with a blockcount of
10,000, and do that 10 times, you get failures some of the time:
❯ for i in `seq 10`; do cat /dev/urandom | rngtest -c 10000 --pipe 2>&1
>/dev/null |rg failures; done
rngtest: FIPS 140-2 failures: 6
rngtest: FIPS 140-2 failures: 5
rngtest: FIPS 140-2 failures: 9
rngtest: FIPS 140-2 failures: 4
rngtest: FIPS 140-2 failures: 6
rngtest: FIPS 140-2 failures: 8
rngtest: FIPS 140-2 failures: 9
rngtest: FIPS 140-2 failures: 11
rngtest: FIPS 140-2 failures: 9
rngtest: FIPS 140-2 failures: 5
We could say that we accept up to 20 failures but even then, there would
be a chance that the YP AB would
occasionally see that fail due the the inherit randomness being tested.
If I run the test 1000 times you can see that on my laptop (6.6.10), 20
failures never happens:
❯ cut -d":" -f3 /tmp/rt.log | sort -n | uniq -c
3 1
7 2
34 3
54 4
101 5
131 6
138 7
124 8
114 9
101 10
75 11
48 12
36 13
16 14
10 15
6 16
1 17
1 19
and on an older headless server running 5.15 with fewer process and
likely less entropy available:
2 1
12 2
29 3
60 4
95 5
117 6
133 7
121 8
139 9
99 10
81 11
50 12
28 13
14 14
9 15
5 16
4 17
2 20
I guess we could raise the limit to ~30 (42!) and failures would be
extremely unlikely.
We would have a similar problem with measuring the boot time that is
dependent on the entropy pool not being depleted
since we can't completely rule out a boot sequence taking 3x as long as
the average time
and it would be worse in qemu given that it's competing with other
processes on the YP AB machines!
../Randy "It's a good day because I made some graphs to understand a
problem." MacLeod
>
> Scott
>
--
# Randy MacLeod
# Wind River Linux
[-- Attachment #2.1: Type: text/html, Size: 7159 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2.2: v6jmaP3xqLBLr8JU.png --]
[-- Type: image/png, Size: 19258 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-09 0:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-10 20:25 [PATCH] rng-tools: move to meta-oe Randy.MacLeod
2024-01-15 16:58 ` [OE-core] " Alexandre Belloni
2024-01-15 20:20 ` Randy MacLeod
2024-01-15 21:17 ` Khem Raj
2024-01-15 21:50 ` Scott Murray
2024-02-09 0:45 ` Randy MacLeod [this message]
2024-02-13 15:25 ` Scott Murray
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55fa276d-e6e2-4cc1-b4fa-660356889665@windriver.com \
--to=randy.macleod@windriver.com \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=anuj.mittal@intel.com \
--cc=david.zuhn@sonos.com \
--cc=jsmoeller@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=scott.murray@konsulko.com \
--cc=stephane.desneux@iot.bzh \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox