From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.dream-property.net (mail.dream-property.net [82.149.226.172]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6A9977047 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 09:42:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.dream-property.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53ADA315B0A4; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 11:42:06 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.dream-property.net Received: from mail.dream-property.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.dream-property.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id aIrKq3HrtgVo; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 11:42:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [172.22.22.61] (55d452fc.access.ecotel.net [85.212.82.252]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.dream-property.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 45DD5315B08F; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 11:42:04 +0200 (CEST) To: Jussi Kukkonen , "Burton, Ross" References: <56056F47.7040004@opendreambox.org> From: Andreas Oberritter Message-ID: <560BAE6B.405@opendreambox.org> Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 11:42:03 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Cc: OE-core Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] connman: Depend on xuser-account unconditionally X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 09:42:07 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 30.09.2015 09:08, Jussi Kukkonen wrote: > I see the patch is in master now but I'll just note here that Ross' idea > here seems like a good solution (even if it makes figuring out the > overall policy a little trickier for humans) and I see nothing that > would prevent it from working. I just got side tracked with other D-Bus > policy bugs while look at this: After I'm done with those I'll make a > patch to move the xuser connman policy to the xuser recipe. Thank you, Jussi! Regards, Andreas