From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from bhuna.collabora.co.uk (bhuna.collabora.co.uk [93.93.135.160]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F056473CBD for ; Fri, 9 Oct 2015 12:24:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender: andrewsh) with ESMTPSA id E65586082B0 From: Andrew Shadura To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Organization: Collabora Limited Message-ID: <5617B211.80002@collabora.co.uk> Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2015 14:24:49 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: Joe Slater Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ifupdown: import recipe X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2015 12:24:59 -0000 X-Groupsio-MsgNum: 72048 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="6WrSvNIkc4G2t6K6MaieUxKefAAfNdf1B" --6WrSvNIkc4G2t6K6MaieUxKefAAfNdf1B Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, I just wanted to comment on this patch pulled with the recipe: > +From 74152ac74a3e1ea0f3be292aa1eeca5ad1fe69c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001= > +From: Paul Gortmaker > +Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2014 15:12:11 -0400 > +Subject: [PATCH 2/2] inet[6].defn: fix inverted checks for loopback I have already commented on this patch when I still was an upstream developer for ifupdown, see . The issue led to this patch was caused by Ubuntu maintainer trying to remove one of the features he deemed as not yet ready for Ubuntu release, but he didn't do it properly on the first attempt, thus leading to broken loopback (which didn't really matter for Ubuntu, as the loopback interface was configured by upstart there back then). The correct fix for the issue would be rebasing to the Debian version of the package which, by the way, has a new active developer, Guus Sliepen. Then the patch could be dropped. --=20 Cheers, Andrew --6WrSvNIkc4G2t6K6MaieUxKefAAfNdf1B Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJWF7IWAAoJEEFnG7NKhJOB8OQP/AkjakRVHj3BmSDR/0AexgSm 9MSal4HxN1v/jCFViVhEEiHYvPcwxGDtMgS8carIaFhISX86mxs/nGh7J/Vtnvre 6tW3qHCL/IKYSXJUv9YXlPgaxvr3PdCnVKhp5quJXpX2FCsRje48Itl3Bg8pqv2G A/6pqUJMEZoIu1q6UxclZVUYyeATlZpF+eb7Ow8nvhHzPgSB1MdIxmYl6zVuIYiB snQOyEXpZpTy5OGn8TpHb5i+H64uMhiOBplOLtphjiPD0EzeW22SpuMVV8FiuORG ZDbq55AB9ClKrOUW7cJkzieZdmNLZ1C6wfGJ448DQCaNu6mejt/VtGtqYvEAanN3 pJJjILXluXCRAOaFYihF/EKIB+92YtqieEMPFm83PIktVVTnT4K5S2vJw4KkfdYp +Pv8tcfi6hGG3PcebFkvG5gCvzWbn5nFLbSEHqY//ImwR9gkbEbLrAZDldNGtoMd Cz/Hygz5VbYHxCDCRoqePtQXAnYa0qZ5C0yPybkjSnHrt64NhRqM1FSuFJF+0dS5 2CGCNslo4Yf9S4hSfNX/cAQLL6M5zyNAxr1FzRTA1g7BOxgdTg9RrCoUBt4Dbs/o c3bPPntcwcD03CCvFqHm2HqaFqfu5EP0b03/8G82XxOus+skiOps1lCc28B2Jl8z tYZ6JbK28rTX3S4n0dDQ =C4ib -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --6WrSvNIkc4G2t6K6MaieUxKefAAfNdf1B--