From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx6-05.smtp.antispamcloud.com (mx6-05.smtp.antispamcloud.com [95.211.2.196]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F058755F4 for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 08:30:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 100-208.ftth.onsbrabantnet.nl ([88.159.208.100] helo=TOP-EX01.TOPIC.LOCAL) by mx6.antispamcloud.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1ZqzeB-0002Mp-E8; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 09:30:33 +0100 Received: from [192.168.80.121] (192.168.80.121) by TOP-EX01.TOPIC.LOCAL (192.168.10.102) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.224.2; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 09:29:10 +0100 To: Sergey 'Jin' Bostandzhyan , References: <20151026151307.GA16394@deadlock.dhs.org> From: Mike Looijmans Organization: TOPIC Message-ID: <562F3615.8040907@topic.nl> Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 09:30:13 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20151026151307.GA16394@deadlock.dhs.org> X-Originating-IP: [192.168.80.121] X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: 9833cda7-5b21-4d34-9a38-8d025ddc3664 X-EXCLAIMER-MD-BIFURCATION-INSTANCE: 0 X-Filter-ID: s0sct1PQhAABKnZB5plbIbbvfIHzQjPVmPLZeVYSu3xU9luQrU+8/8qthi+0Jd/W6KAUC/fjyuDn NXFr4uarw2b4JrXPy6/bMqmNesZXSHDhcQdEuTxqpK2WBlBljYFxIiL8jpVorCDRyRz8s+N1dwYH 6+C4wCQ+Wzm9DzluoY4kzW+lLm5fs3AP07hCrxG0G/45LuYWJsWNKzGzAznZ/oq+Kj8XsfH6M1iC r9Pl7cTsYlvFccfyefK3rf6//Zz3TmXIsgwsHEGBU3qhW0Osz84CxdOlMbYC7Cyh0TS8wxz2fsmK inR3OUlIyA/09h1V5YE5enyccp7RH4WQio3uGcdGxQ6d5hivGO7oPpIBNraJdlCnvQ+khpxZdnh3 Rg+eq6FYx9JcxaWalMnLitersBpW6anL7tC8sZz8vH3+AmVuDfHvHcz98qdqfyBu7+vBXgEv6IcZ yhgDwEXM/y2dENLMQ7BHiJbu58xrnlvfsHxFpVkKCyND7N5gKvIbHYAyNC21jdz1tZu80T3nzSSG Qf9qwM7RXpJS8RjTdyh2j5Bl3tVk0zvXhIncNpb4rh9W1mAshzxi/pH8tL+eoCWzQJqOK2s30lVp LO7zSzcHnUsSYuA67lhZAkD3Jep4WLi4dpEz9Gwe39F7zwtl+PHiqBqZR3KVQgqF/fPYYAfEfsh2 09d1vs84nVIeSXSCzP2kdHa+JbJzvTaeZjZqn02HJltENAqPiFTVkXlpuZ1TdQ9cdH2/qKNtBIzq TOCSOTIm X-Report-Abuse-To: spam@mx99.antispamcloud.com X-Filter-Fingerprint: IFrWXGses7OKB5S5G8/dJXhXyDRoOQM5J3kcUr0HrMvJUWjZ8+qhjyB23tbDuyLOYL8Ff78gYsez 4Rl08xudmXi4esCQ0R1MchVjt7wblGlvhFgW0MjUMRkF5sMCDfftTXNFDzN17hnrWeZYOJvLq0Ic WjZ+XcEjj/7Pkld0zkmvziDInX9WdMov2kn2yXjdwv61T+KDYyYtREgszdyFwv8IxCB3p/oCKvxr eyISh3JGb7OS5oVgiO+kDxZrVPLz3MmEGC2PrUKqLq5WmHK+Nw== X-Originating-IP: 88.159.208.100 X-Spampanel-Domain: topic.nl X-Spampanel-Username: 88.159.208.100 Authentication-Results: antispamcloud.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=88.159.208.100@topic.nl X-Spampanel-Outgoing-Class: ham X-Spampanel-Outgoing-Evidence: Combined (0.00) X-Recommended-Action: accept Subject: Re: Problem with RDEPENDS in multimachine builds for allarch packages X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 08:30:35 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =EF=BB=BFOn 26-10-15 16:13, Sergey 'Jin' Bostandzhyan wrote: > Hi, > > I recently ran into a problem that I described here: > https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D8578 and while debugg= ing > this issue an other problem came to light. > > I have a multimachine configuration (armv5/imx6) and the same distro for = both > of them (poky 2.0 RC based). > > I have some allarch packages which have no DEPENDS, however which have an > RDEPENDS_${PN} setting. > > I can see that even though there were no changes to the recipe itself and > also no changes to the recipes listed in RDEPENDS, my recipe still gets > rebuilt each time. > > What we tried: > > so cleansstate the recipe, change machine, cleansstate ag= ain, > then build it, then change machine, build it again and n= ote > the first task that executes > > The logs for these steps, one with RDEPENDS and one without are at the en= d of > this mail. I can see that with present RDEPENDS "real" tasks get executed > even though no changes occured in the recipe; this is not the case when I > drop RDEPENDS. > > Is this a bug or is this just something that needs to be documented? I think it's the same problem as described here: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.handhelds.openembedded.core/70070/focus= =3D70072 > What is the "desired" behaviour? Apparently, this needless rebuilding is "desired". Kind regards, Mike Looijmans System Expert TOPIC Embedded Products Eindhovenseweg 32-C, NL-5683 KH Best Postbus 440, NL-5680 AK Best Telefoon: +31 (0) 499 33 69 79 Telefax: +31 (0) 499 33 69 70 E-mail: mike.looijmans@topicproducts.com Website: www.topicproducts.com Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail Visit us at : Aerospace Electrical Systems Expo Europe which will be held f= rom 17.11.2015 till 19.11.2015, Findorffstrasse 101 Bremen, Germany, Hall 5= , stand number C65 http://www.aesexpo.eu