From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ptmx.org (ptmx.org [178.63.28.110]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9348965CBF for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 14:29:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.1.14.248] (vpn.streamunlimited.com [91.114.0.140]) by ptmx.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BFDDB23844 for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 15:29:58 +0100 (CET) To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org References: <5641FF6D.7000508@linux.intel.com> From: Carlos Rafael Giani Message-ID: <5641FF66.7040705@pseudoterminal.org> Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 15:29:58 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5641FF6D.7000508@linux.intel.com> Subject: Re: [RFC] Remove vala from oe-core X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 14:30:03 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 11/10/2015 03:30 PM, Alexander Kanavin wrote: > On 11/10/2015 04:22 PM, Jussi Kukkonen wrote: > >> There's currently no software built with vala in oe-core. That's not >> great for vala (as it's not getting the automated testing that high >> quality maintenance would require) and it's not great for oe-core (as >> maintenance effort is better spent on components that _are_ used). >> >> Based on the above there's a feature request** to remove vala from >> oe-core. Please comment here or on the bug if you think this is an >> inappropriate idea or have suggestions. > > I have to say no. A lot of things in oe-core (libsoup for instance) > come with an option to build vala bindings which in turn require > native vapigen binary provided by vala package. > > Alex > Doesn't vala rely on GObject introspection, which is unsupported in OE?