From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E05A65CBF for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 14:29:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 10 Nov 2015 06:29:01 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,270,1444719600"; d="scan'208";a="847001087" Received: from kanavin-desktop.fi.intel.com (HELO [10.237.68.161]) ([10.237.68.161]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 10 Nov 2015 06:29:01 -0800 Message-ID: <5641FF6D.7000508@linux.intel.com> Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 16:30:05 +0200 From: Alexander Kanavin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org References: In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [RFC] Remove vala from oe-core X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 14:29:02 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 11/10/2015 04:22 PM, Jussi Kukkonen wrote: > There's currently no software built with vala in oe-core. That's not > great for vala (as it's not getting the automated testing that high > quality maintenance would require) and it's not great for oe-core (as > maintenance effort is better spent on components that _are_ used). > > Based on the above there's a feature request** to remove vala from > oe-core. Please comment here or on the bug if you think this is an > inappropriate idea or have suggestions. I have to say no. A lot of things in oe-core (libsoup for instance) come with an option to build vala bindings which in turn require native vapigen binary provided by vala package. Alex