From: Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tune-cortexa5.inc: Allow tuning for vfpv3d16, vfpv3 and neon-vfpv4
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 13:11:56 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5644E47C.70904@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151112184340.GE4230@piout.net>
On 11/12/15 12:43 PM, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> On 12/11/2015 at 12:26:57 -0600, Mark Hatle wrote :
>> Seems odd to me that the package arch are the same between the generic (assumed
>> to be the default ARMv7a, which is USUALLY VFPv4-D32 in most cases.)
>>
>> If we want to limit to v3 and/or D16. It might make sense for a different
>> package arch, otherwise there is no way to separate the feeds in a
>> multiple-machine configuration with different per-target optimizations.
>>
>> (similarly the -neon versions as well, but that is existing code)
>>
>
> Yeah, I'm also not sure this is the correct thing but all the package
> arch for tune-armv7a* are armv7a so I've replicated that.
>
> Also, I just realized there are no users for armv7a*-vfpv3* in oe-core,
> maybe I should leave those tunes in my soc specific BSP layer?
>
There are a lot of tunes defined that have no direct oe-core users. We try to
define things we think are useful and supported by the included toolchain.
External BSPs may be required to actually test it.
--Mark
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-12 19:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-12 18:06 [PATCH] tune-cortexa5.inc: Allow tuning for vfpv3d16, vfpv3 and neon-vfpv4 Alexandre Belloni
2015-11-12 18:26 ` Mark Hatle
2015-11-12 18:43 ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-11-12 19:11 ` Mark Hatle [this message]
2015-11-12 19:15 ` Martin Jansa
2015-11-13 9:33 ` Alexandre Belloni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5644E47C.70904@windriver.com \
--to=mark.hatle@windriver.com \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox