From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36FA26E26B; Mon, 16 Nov 2015 09:42:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 16 Nov 2015 01:42:21 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,301,1444719600"; d="scan'208";a="851874626" Received: from kanavin-desktop.fi.intel.com (HELO [10.237.68.161]) ([10.237.68.161]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 16 Nov 2015 01:42:20 -0800 Message-ID: <5649A542.8000307@linux.intel.com> Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 11:43:30 +0200 From: Alexander Kanavin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org, Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer References: <58488.10.252.13.130.1447346734.squirrel@linux.intel.com> <4335862.fNWyiaI9Bu@peggleto-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com> <20151113114617.GB2567@jama> In-Reply-To: <20151113114617.GB2567@jama> Subject: Re: [oe] qt4 moves out of oe-core - to meta-qt4, or to meta-oe? X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 09:42:25 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 11/13/2015 01:46 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: >>>> 1) or even better in a separate repo >>> >>> To be honest, I had anticipated this being a separate meta-qt4 repo myself. It >>> would be consistent with what has been done with Qt 5 and much earlier with >>> Qt 3. >> >> Agreed. > > I'm also fine with separate layer. > > Even better for me, I'll be less tempted to include it in my world > builds and to fix qt-mobility-* issues. Making a separate repository with this layer is even more disruptive, and complicates administration and maintenance. I'm not going to handle those. So I'll make a meta-qt4 layer under meta-oe, and it's fine if there is no official maintainer or ongoing build testing for it at least until someone volunteers to pick it up. Alex