Openembedded Core Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andreas Oberritter <obi@opendreambox.org>
To: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com>,
	openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org,
	Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
	<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [oe] qt4 moves out of oe-core - to meta-qt4, or to meta-oe?
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 11:07:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5649AACB.6070204@opendreambox.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5649A542.8000307@linux.intel.com>

On 16.11.2015 10:43, Alexander Kanavin wrote:
> On 11/13/2015 01:46 PM, Martin Jansa wrote:
> 
>>>>> 1) or even better in a separate repo
>>>>
>>>> To be honest, I had anticipated this being a separate meta-qt4 repo
>>>> myself. It
>>>> would be consistent with what has been done with Qt 5 and much
>>>> earlier with
>>>> Qt 3.
>>>
>>> Agreed.
>>
>> I'm also fine with separate layer.
>>
>> Even better for me, I'll be less tempted to include it in my world
>> builds and to fix qt-mobility-* issues.
> 
> Making a separate repository with this layer is even more disruptive,
> and complicates administration and maintenance. I'm not going to handle
> those. So I'll make a meta-qt4 layer under meta-oe, and it's fine if
> there is no official maintainer or ongoing build testing for it at least
> until someone volunteers to pick it up.

Basically everyone agreed on moving qt4 to its own repo. And your
conclusion is to ignore that and move qt4 to meta-openembedded, already
expecting bitrot?

Regards,
Andreas



  reply	other threads:[~2015-11-16 10:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-12 16:45 qt4 moves out of oe-core - to meta-qt4, or to meta-oe? alexander.kanavin
2015-11-12 17:03 ` Andreas Müller
2015-11-12 19:08   ` Paul Eggleton
2015-11-13 11:39     ` [oe] " Otavio Salvador
2015-11-13 11:46       ` Martin Jansa
2015-11-16  9:43         ` Alexander Kanavin
2015-11-16 10:07           ` Andreas Oberritter [this message]
2015-11-16 10:26             ` volunteers for meta-qt4 repo maintenance? Alexander Kanavin
2015-11-18 22:08               ` Paul Eggleton
2015-11-16 11:20           ` [oe] qt4 moves out of oe-core - to meta-qt4, or to meta-oe? Otavio Salvador
2015-11-16 11:23             ` Alexander Kanavin
2015-11-16 11:24               ` Otavio Salvador
2015-11-16 17:10                 ` akuster808
2015-11-16 17:39                   ` Mark Hatle
2015-11-12 17:19 ` Martin Jansa
2015-11-12 17:38   ` alexander.kanavin
2015-11-12 18:59     ` Martin Jansa
2015-11-16 10:37       ` [oe] " Burton, Ross

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5649AACB.6070204@opendreambox.org \
    --to=obi@opendreambox.org \
    --cc=alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    --cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox