From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail1.windriver.com (mail1.windriver.com [147.11.146.13]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55CA260110 for ; Sun, 22 Nov 2015 09:38:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hca.corp.ad.wrs.com [147.11.189.40]) by mail1.windriver.com (8.15.2/8.15.1) with ESMTPS id tAM9cKnE022383 (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Sun, 22 Nov 2015 01:38:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from [128.224.162.160] (128.224.162.160) by ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.40) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.248.2; Sun, 22 Nov 2015 01:38:20 -0800 To: "Robert P. J. Day" References: <56518812.2030705@windriver.com> From: Robert Yang Message-ID: <56518D0A.7060007@windriver.com> Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2015 17:38:18 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Cc: OE Core mailing list Subject: Re: what is the value of 'BBPATH ?= ""' in layer.conf? X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2015 09:38:27 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 11/22/2015 05:29 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > On Sun, 22 Nov 2015, Robert Yang wrote: > >> >> >> On 11/22/2015 05:10 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: >>> >>> perusing some wind river layers, and in the layer.conf file here: >>> >>> https://github.com/WindRiver-OpenSourceLabs/wr-kernel/blob/LB21_7.0_RCPL0002/conf/layer.conf >>> >>> i see the opening snippet: >>> >>> BBPATH ?= "" >>> # We have a conf and classes directory, add to BBPATH >>> BBPATH := "${LAYERDIR}:${BBPATH}" >>> >>> what is the purpose of that initial assignment >>> >>> BBPATH ?= "" >> >> There would be a warning when BBPATH is null, but that had been fixed, >> so we don't need it nowadays. >> >> // Robert > > i thought as much, i just wanted to be sure. i am a rabid minimalist > in that, if a line has no value, it should be removed, mostly to avoid > confusing people like me. :-) i noticed at least a couple WR-OSL > layers that had that construct, you can decide if you care enough > about it to clean it up. thanks for the clarifiation. Thanks, we have cleaned that up in new release. // Robert > > rday >