Openembedded Core Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com>
To: Robert Yang <liezhi.yang@windriver.com>,
	<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] package_manager.py: fix RPM_PREFER_ELF_ARCH for mips
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 08:20:05 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56532095.5090301@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <991915823dfa6b4cabe990272b246cf4bad05038.1448285591.git.liezhi.yang@windriver.com>

On 11/23/15 7:41 AM, Robert Yang wrote:
> We can install 64 bit pkg to 32 bit pkg, so the previous checking is
> incorrect, it should not only check mips64 or mips64el, the "mips"
> should work, and 64bit ELF can also use mips as TUNE_ARCH, and there
> are other mips varieties, so only check whether TUNE_ARCH starts with
> mips or not.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Robert Yang <liezhi.yang@windriver.com>
> ---
>  meta/lib/oe/package_manager.py |    9 ++++-----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/meta/lib/oe/package_manager.py b/meta/lib/oe/package_manager.py
> index 964fddc..5e7bb66 100644
> --- a/meta/lib/oe/package_manager.py
> +++ b/meta/lib/oe/package_manager.py
> @@ -954,12 +954,11 @@ class RpmPM(PackageManager):
>                  bb.fatal("Invalid RPM_PREFER_ELF_ARCH: %s, it should be one of:\n"
>                          "\t1: ELF32 wins\n"
>                          "\t2: ELF64 wins\n"
> -                        "\t4: ELF64 N32 wins (mips64 or mips64el only)" %
> +                        "\t4: ELF64 N32 wins (mips only)" %

N32 is only available on a MIPS64 platform.  It requires MIPS64 instructions,
which is why it is documented as such above.

>                          prefer_color)
> -            if prefer_color == "4" and self.d.getVar("TUNE_ARCH", True) not in \
> -                                    ['mips64', 'mips64el']:
> -                bb.fatal("RPM_PREFER_ELF_ARCH = \"4\" is for mips64 or mips64el "
> -                         "only.")
> +            if prefer_color == "4" and not \
> +                    self.d.getVar("TUNE_ARCH", True).startswith('mips'):
> +                bb.fatal("RPM_PREFER_ELF_ARCH = \"4\" is for mips only.")

The bug is that it's looking for TUNE_ARCH, it should be MACHINE_ARCH in this
case.  Since the overall MACHINE Is what defined if it can be used or not.

--Mark

>              self._invoke_smart('config --set rpm-extra-macros._prefer_color=%s'
>                          % prefer_color)
>  
> 



  reply	other threads:[~2015-11-23 14:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-23 13:41 [PATCH 0/1] package_manager.py: fix RPM_PREFER_ELF_ARCH for mips Robert Yang
2015-11-23 13:41 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Robert Yang
2015-11-23 14:20   ` Mark Hatle [this message]
2015-11-23 16:00     ` Mark Hatle

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56532095.5090301@windriver.com \
    --to=mark.hatle@windriver.com \
    --cc=liezhi.yang@windriver.com \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox