Openembedded Core Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com>
To: <openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [v2 PATCH 2/2] rpm: fix file conflicts for MIPS64 N32
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 15:49:36 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <565F6770.7070401@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1449091845-168695-3-git-send-email-mark.hatle@windriver.com>

On 12/2/15 3:30 PM, Mark Hatle wrote:
> From: Robert Yang <liezhi.yang@windriver.com>
> 
> The following error can occur:
>   smart install libc6-2.22-r0.1@lib32_mips32r2octeon3 libc6-dbg-2.22-r0.1@lib32_mips32r2octeon3
> error: file /sbin/ldconfig conflicts between attempted installs of libc6-2.22-r0.1.lib32_mips32r2octeon3 and libc6-2.22-r0.1.octeon3_n32
> error: file /sbin/.debug/ldconfig conflicts between attempted installs of libc6-dbg-2.22-r0.1.lib32_mips32r2octeon3 and libc6-dbg-2.22-r0.1.octeon3_n32
> 
> This was because:
> transactions_color = 001 (ELF32) & 010 (ELF64) & 100 (ELF32 N32 MIPS64)
> FColor = Current file color (001) & transaction_color (111)
> oFcolor = Previous file color (100) & transaction_color (111)
> 
> There are two places where the conflict comparisons occur.  In both places
> the 'else' clause was too restrictive (opposite of the 'positive' clause).
> This caused the system to only permit a binary comparison - "new preferred" or
> "old preferred".  It did not permissing "neither preferred".  By removing the

Above should be written "It did not -permit- "neither preferred"."

Updated version available at:

git://git.yoctoproject.org/poky-contrib mgh/rpm-n32


> else comparison the system will now perform a 'last-in-wins' resolution when
> "neither is preferred".
> 
> Note, if _transaction_color is 3, MIPS64 N32 will be skipped (pretend as
> installed).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Robert Yang <liezhi.yang@windriver.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com>
> ---
>  ...ction.c-fix-file-conflicts-for-mips64-N32.patch | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm_5.4.14.bb            |  1 +
>  2 files changed, 53 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm/rpm-lib-transaction.c-fix-file-conflicts-for-mips64-N32.patch
> 
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm/rpm-lib-transaction.c-fix-file-conflicts-for-mips64-N32.patch b/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm/rpm-lib-transaction.c-fix-file-conflicts-for-mips64-N32.patch
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..ed5d8a7
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm/rpm-lib-transaction.c-fix-file-conflicts-for-mips64-N32.patch
> @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
> +From 67ec7531e6297200eaa97ef917d49b0a75876cb4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> +From: Robert Yang <liezhi.yang@windriver.com>
> +Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 00:56:07 -0800
> +Subject: [PATCH] lib/transaction.c: fix file conflicts for MIPS64 N32
> +
> +The following error can occur:
> +  smart install libc6-2.22-r0.1@lib32_mips32r2octeon3 libc6-dbg-2.22-r0.1@lib32_mips32r2octeon3
> +error: file /sbin/ldconfig conflicts between attempted installs of libc6-2.22-r0.1.lib32_mips32r2octeon3 and libc6-2.22-r0.1.octeon3_n32
> +error: file /sbin/.debug/ldconfig conflicts between attempted installs of libc6-dbg-2.22-r0.1.lib32_mips32r2octeon3 and libc6-dbg-2.22-r0.1.octeon3_n32
> +
> +This was because:
> +transactions_color = 001 (ELF32) & 010 (ELF64) & 100 (ELF32 N32 MIPS64)
> +FColor = Current file color (001) & transaction_color (111)
> +oFcolor = Previous file color (100) & transaction_color (111)
> +
> +There are two places where the conflict comparisons occur.  In both places
> +the 'else' clause was too restrictive (opposite of the 'positive' clause).
> +This caused the system to only permit a binary comparison - "new preferred" or
> +"old preferred".  It did not permissing "neither preferred".  By removing the
> +else comparison the system will now perform a 'last-in-wins' resolution when
> +"neither is preferred".
> +
> +Upstream-Status: Pending
> +
> +Signed-off-by: Robert Yang <liezhi.yang@windriver.com>
> +Signed-off-by: Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com>
> +---
> + lib/transaction.c |    3 ++-
> + 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> +
> +Index: rpm-5.4.14/lib/transaction.c
> +===================================================================
> +--- rpm-5.4.14.orig/lib/transaction.c
> ++++ rpm-5.4.14/lib/transaction.c
> +@@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ static int handleInstInstalledFile(const
> + 		fi->actions[fx] = FA_SKIPCOLOR;
> + #endif
> + 		rConflicts = 0;
> +-	    } else if (FColor & prefcolor) {
> ++	    } else {
> + #ifdef	REFERENCE
> + 		rpmfsSetAction(fs, fx, FA_CREATE);
> + #else
> +@@ -420,7 +420,7 @@ assert(otherFi != NULL);
> + 			fi->actions[i] = FA_SKIPCOLOR;
> + 			rConflicts = 0;
> + 		    } else
> +-		    if (FColor == 0 && oFColor == 0) {
> ++		    {
> + 			/* ... otherwise, do both, last in wins. */
> + 			otherFi->actions[otherFileNum] = FA_CREATE;
> + 			fi->actions[i] = FA_CREATE;
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm_5.4.14.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm_5.4.14.bb
> index e22d208..09baac0 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm_5.4.14.bb
> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm_5.4.14.bb
> @@ -102,6 +102,7 @@ SRC_URI = "http://www.rpm5.org/files/rpm/rpm-5.4/rpm-5.4.14-0.20131024.src.rpm;e
>  	   file://configure.ac-check-for-both-gpg2-and-gpg.patch \
>  	   file://0001-define-EM_AARCH64.patch \
>  	   file://rpm-rpmfc.c-fix-for-N32-MIPS64.patch \
> +	   file://rpm-lib-transaction.c-fix-file-conflicts-for-mips64-N32.patch \
>  	  "
>  
>  # Uncomment the following line to enable platform score debugging
> 



      reply	other threads:[~2015-12-02 21:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-02 21:30 [v2 PATCH 0/2] rpm: Enable MIPS64 N32 transactions Mark Hatle
2015-12-02 21:30 ` [PATCH 1/2] rpm_5.4.14: " Mark Hatle
2015-12-02 21:30 ` [v2 PATCH 2/2] rpm: fix file conflicts for MIPS64 N32 Mark Hatle
2015-12-02 21:49   ` Mark Hatle [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=565F6770.7070401@windriver.com \
    --to=mark.hatle@windriver.com \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox