From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail5.wrs.com (mail5.windriver.com [192.103.53.11]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 448706FFF7 for ; Fri, 4 Dec 2015 02:17:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hca.corp.ad.wrs.com [147.11.189.40]) by mail5.wrs.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id tB42HCgL021195 (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=OK); Thu, 3 Dec 2015 18:17:12 -0800 Received: from [128.224.162.231] (128.224.162.231) by ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.248.2; Thu, 3 Dec 2015 18:17:11 -0800 To: "Burton, Ross" References: From: Kang Kai Message-ID: <5660F7A6.8070102@windriver.com> Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2015 10:17:10 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Cc: OE-core Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] packagegroup-core-tools-testapps: disable kexec for mips64 and mis64n32 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2015 02:17:16 -0000 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------070206020607000309030401" --------------070206020607000309030401 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 2015年12月03日 22:13, Burton, Ross wrote: > > On 3 December 2015 at 06:32, > wrote: > > @@ -15,6 +15,8 @@ inherit packagegroup > KEXECTOOLS ?= "kexec" > KEXECTOOLS_mips ?= "" > KEXECTOOLS_mipsel ?= "" > +KEXECTOOLS_mips64 ?= "" > +KEXECTOOLS_mips64n32 ?= "" > KEXECTOOLS_powerpc ?= "" > KEXECTOOLS_e5500-64b ?= "" > KEXECTOOLS_aarch64 ?= "" > > > I've rebased this on top of Maxin's patch that removed many of these > exclusions (mips, mipsel, powerpc, aarch64), but could you confirm > that is the right thing to do? Hi Ross, I didn't find Maxin's patch on oe-core list. I double check with our bsp guy that kexec supports mips now but may need extra drivers for each board. So please ignore this patch. Thanks, Kai > > Ross -- Regards, Neil | Kai Kang --------------070206020607000309030401 Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
On 2015年12月03日 22:13, Burton, Ross wrote:

On 3 December 2015 at 06:32, <kai.kang@windriver.com> wrote:
@@ -15,6 +15,8 @@ inherit packagegroup
 KEXECTOOLS ?= "kexec"
 KEXECTOOLS_mips ?= ""
 KEXECTOOLS_mipsel ?= ""
+KEXECTOOLS_mips64 ?= ""
+KEXECTOOLS_mips64n32 ?= ""
 KEXECTOOLS_powerpc ?= ""
 KEXECTOOLS_e5500-64b ?= ""
 KEXECTOOLS_aarch64 ?= ""

I've rebased this on top of Maxin's patch that removed many of these exclusions (mips, mipsel, powerpc, aarch64), but could you confirm that is the right thing to do?

Hi Ross,

I didn't find Maxin's patch on oe-core list. I double check with our bsp guy that kexec supports mips now but may need extra drivers  for each board.

So please ignore this patch.

Thanks,
Kai


Ross


-- 
Regards,
Neil | Kai Kang
--------------070206020607000309030401--