From: Mariano Lopez <mariano.lopez@linux.intel.com>
To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org,
openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: [RFC] Mark of upstream CVE patches
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 10:03:45 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <567039E1.5000205@linux.intel.com> (raw)
There is an initiative to track vulnerable software being built (see
bugs 8119 and 7515). The idea is to have a testing tool that would check
the recipe versions against CVEs. In order to accomplish such task there
is need to reliable mark the patches from upstream that solve CVEs.
There have been two options to mark the patches that solve CVEs:
1. Have "CVE" and the CVE number as the patch filename.
Pros:
Doesn't require a new tag.
Cons:
It is not flexible to add more information, for example two CVEs in
the same patch
2. Add a new tag in the patch that have the CVE information.
Pros:
It is flexible and can add more information.
Cons:
Require a change in the patch metadata.
What I would recommend is to add a new tag in the patch, it must contain
the CVE ID. With this it would be possible to look for the CVE
information easily in the testing tool or in NIST, MITRE, or another web
page. For example, this would be part of the patch for CVE-2013-6435,
currently in OE-Core:
-- snip --
Upstream-Status: Backport
CVE: CVE-2013-6435
Reference:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2013-6435
-- snip --
The expected output of this discussion is a standard format for CVE
patches that most, if not all, of community members agree on.
Please let me know your comments.
Cheers,
Mariano Lopez
next reply other threads:[~2015-12-15 16:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-15 16:03 Mariano Lopez [this message]
2015-12-15 16:26 ` [RFC] Mark of upstream CVE patches Otavio Salvador
2015-12-15 16:30 ` Philip Balister
2015-12-15 16:37 ` Richard Purdie
2015-12-15 16:49 ` Philip Balister
2015-12-15 17:13 ` Richard Purdie
2015-12-15 17:17 ` Mariano Lopez
2015-12-16 9:03 ` Sona Sarmadi
2015-12-16 9:21 ` Burton, Ross
2016-01-04 18:25 ` Mariano Lopez
2016-01-04 20:17 ` [oe] " Benjamin Esquivel
2016-01-08 15:22 ` Mariano Lopez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=567039E1.5000205@linux.intel.com \
--to=mariano.lopez@linux.intel.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox