From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABAE7605FE; Tue, 15 Dec 2015 17:17:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 15 Dec 2015 09:17:03 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,433,1444719600"; d="scan'208";a="618437084" Received: from mlopezva-mobl2.zpn.intel.com (HELO [10.219.24.58]) ([10.219.24.58]) by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 15 Dec 2015 09:17:02 -0800 To: Richard Purdie , Philip Balister , openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org, openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org, openembedded-architecture References: <567039E1.5000205@linux.intel.com> <5670400E.6030201@balister.org> <1450197453.13505.72.camel@linuxfoundation.org> <567044A7.8050505@balister.org> <1450199606.13505.79.camel@linuxfoundation.org> From: Mariano Lopez Message-ID: <56704B14.5040108@linux.intel.com> Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 11:17:08 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1450199606.13505.79.camel@linuxfoundation.org> Subject: Re: [RFC] Mark of upstream CVE patches X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 17:17:03 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 12/15/2015 11:13 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Tue, 2015-12-15 at 11:49 -0500, Philip Balister wrote: >> On 12/15/2015 11:37 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: >>> On Tue, 2015-12-15 at 11:30 -0500, Philip Balister wrote: >>>> I also suggest copying the >>>> >>>> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto-security >>>> >>>> list. >>> and the architecture list, this is something that should apply to >>> more >>> than OE-Core ideally. >> I thought the exact same thing seconds after hitting send. I'll let >> the >> security and architecture people decide which list is best for >> discussion. >> >> What I do want to see is fewer discussions cross posted across many >> lists. > Agreed, right now I just want people to get thinking about the right > place for some of these discussions to happen too though. > > I suspect the right place is architecture since we're likely going to > want to update the patch submission guidelines and reach a wide > audience with this. I believe Mariano will repost onto the architecture > list and anyone interested can join in there. I just started the thread onto the architecture list, lets move move the discussion there. Here is the link: http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-architecture/2015-December/000025.html > > Cheers, > > Richard > > > > >