From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.windriver.com (mail.windriver.com [147.11.1.11]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79AE670022 for ; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 03:31:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hca.corp.ad.wrs.com [147.11.189.40]) by mail.windriver.com (8.15.2/8.15.1) with ESMTPS id tBI3VqCA007671 (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 17 Dec 2015 19:31:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from [128.224.162.169] (128.224.162.169) by ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.248.2; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 19:31:51 -0800 To: "Burton, Ross" References: <1446445418-31492-1-git-send-email-jian.liu@windriver.com> From: Jian Liu Message-ID: <56737E20.6000201@windriver.com> Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 11:31:44 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Originating-IP: [128.224.162.169] Cc: OE-core Subject: Re: [PATCH] archiver.bbclass: do checkout for kernel X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 03:31:53 -0000 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------010406040905060708000009" --------------010406040905060708000009 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi Ross, I test this patch. I seem to have no relationship with my issue. This patch just optimizes some tasks. My problem seems to be gotten around by a patch 523e4f6a6913b64453579d27a02467e14f7df42e submitted by Bruce. "bareclone=1" is removed from SRC_URI. So kernel source is not a bare repo any more. I do not know why "bareclone=1" is removed. This option seems to have no side effect on kernel. So I thinks this should be a hidden trouble. Do you have any ideas? Thanks! Jian On 2015年12月17日 06:29, Burton, Ross wrote: > > On 2 November 2015 at 06:23, Jian Liu > wrote: > > The repo of kernel is bare git repository and we need to checkout > to get > the source code. > > > A recent patch to archiver ("fix previous issue regarding work-shared > for linux-yocto") claims to fix this, can you confirm if that fixes > this problem or if this fixes more edge cases regarding the kernel. > > Cheers, > Ross --------------010406040905060708000009 Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi Ross,

I test this patch. I seem to have no relationship with my issue. This patch just optimizes some tasks.

My problem seems to be gotten around by a patch 523e4f6a6913b64453579d27a02467e14f7df42e submitted by Bruce.
"bareclone=1" is removed from SRC_URI. So kernel source is not a bare repo any more.

I do not know why "bareclone=1" is removed. This option seems to have no side effect on kernel.
So I thinks this should be a hidden trouble.

Do you have any ideas?

Thanks!

Jian

On 2015年12月17日 06:29, Burton, Ross wrote:

On 2 November 2015 at 06:23, Jian Liu <jian.liu@windriver.com> wrote:
The repo of kernel is bare git repository and we need to checkout to get
the source code.

A recent patch to archiver ("fix previous issue regarding work-shared for linux-yocto") claims to fix this, can you confirm if that fixes this problem or if this fixes more edge cases regarding the kernel.

Cheers,
Ross

--------------010406040905060708000009--