From: Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com>
To: Ming Liu <liu.ming50@gmail.com>,
<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Cc: yue.tao@windriver.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Introduces kernel-initramfs recipe to resolve a implicit dependency issue
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 12:06:50 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5697D5AA.1030109@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1451999565-3502-1-git-send-email-liu.ming50@gmail.com>
Just bumping this review to let you know that I haven't forgotten
about it.
I've been looking at the details at least twice now, but haven't
managed to sort everything out.
I'll pick this up again shortly.
Bruce
On 16-01-05 08:12 AM, Ming Liu wrote:
> In current initramfs bundled kernel packaging policy, there are several
> dependency chains co-existing:
>
> | "core-image-minimal.do_build" -> "core-image-minimal.do_bundle_initramfs"
> | "core-image-minimal.do_bundle_initramfs" -> "virtual/kernel.do_bundle_initramfs"
> | "core-image-minimal.do_bundle_initramfs" -> "core-image-minimal.do_rootfs"
> | "core-image-minimal.do_rootfs" -> "virtual/kernel.do_package_write_${IMAGE_PKGTYPE}"
> | "virtual/kernel.do_package_write_${IMAGE_PKGTYPE}" -> "virtual/kernel.do_package"
> | "virtual/kernel.do_package" -> "virtual/kernel.do_install"
> |
> | "virtual/kernel.do_deploy" -> "virtual/kernel.do_bundle_initramfs"
> | "virtual/kernel.do_bundle_initramfs" -> "virtual/kernel.do_install"
>
> We could see, virtual/kernel.do_package is not explicitly depending on
> virtual/kernel.do_bundle_initramfs so far, therefore, there is not a
> workable way to add initramfs bundled kernel image into rootfs, because
> kernel's do_bundle_initramfs could run parallelly with its do_package,
> which means we will get a implicit kernel-image package that sometimes it
> contains the initramfs bundled kernel or sometimes it doesn't.
>
> To fix this problem, the idea is to let the initramfs bundled kernel
> packaging depend on do_bundle_initramfs, meanwhile, to avoid the circular
> dependency issue that commit: 609d5a9ab9e58bb1c2bcc2145399fbc8b701b85a
> [ kernel.bbclass, image.bbclass: Implement kernel INITRAMFS dependency and bundling ]
>
> was trying to address, this dependency has to be splitted from kernel
> recipe(at least, I could not figure out another way to achieve it), so a
> new kernel-initramfs is introduced, in which a dependency chain is created:
>
> | "kernel-initramfs.do_install" -> "virtual/kernel.do_deploy"
> | "virtual/kernel.do_deploy" -> "virtual/kernel.do_bundle_initramfs"
>
> Then the users can add initramfs bundled kernel image into rootfs by:
>
> IMAGE_INSTALL_append = " kernel-initramfs"
>
> without introducing any circular dependencies.
>
> Ming Liu (3):
> kernel.bbclass: do not install initramfs bundled kernel image
> image.bbclass: removes bundle_initramfs related code
> kernel-initramfs: new recipe, creates initramfs bundled kernel
> packaging
>
> meta/classes/image.bbclass | 11 -----
> meta/classes/kernel.bbclass | 4 --
> meta/recipes-kernel/linux/kernel-initramfs.bb | 69 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 meta/recipes-kernel/linux/kernel-initramfs.bb
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-14 17:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-05 13:12 [PATCH 0/3] Introduces kernel-initramfs recipe to resolve a implicit dependency issue Ming Liu
2016-01-05 13:12 ` [PATCH 1/3] kernel.bbclass: do not install initramfs bundled kernel image Ming Liu
2016-01-19 19:39 ` Bruce Ashfield
2016-01-19 21:57 ` Ming Liu
2016-01-20 4:43 ` Bruce Ashfield
2016-01-20 23:29 ` Ming Liu
2016-01-22 20:39 ` Bruce Ashfield
2016-01-26 22:12 ` Ming Liu
2016-01-26 23:22 ` Andrea Adami
2016-01-05 13:12 ` [PATCH 2/3] image.bbclass: removes bundle_initramfs related code Ming Liu
2016-01-05 13:12 ` [PATCH 3/3] kernel-initramfs: new recipe, creates initramfs bundled kernel packaging Ming Liu
2016-01-14 17:06 ` Bruce Ashfield [this message]
2016-01-15 8:46 ` [PATCH 0/3] Introduces kernel-initramfs recipe to resolve a implicit dependency issue Ming Liu
2016-01-19 19:34 ` Bruce Ashfield
2016-01-19 21:37 ` Ming Liu
2016-01-19 22:03 ` Ming Liu
2016-01-20 5:03 ` Bruce Ashfield
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5697D5AA.1030109@windriver.com \
--to=bruce.ashfield@windriver.com \
--cc=liu.ming50@gmail.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=yue.tao@windriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox