From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail1.windriver.com (mail1.windriver.com [147.11.146.13]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 434DD6612D for ; Wed, 20 Jan 2016 08:21:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hca.corp.ad.wrs.com [147.11.189.40]) by mail1.windriver.com (8.15.2/8.15.1) with ESMTPS id u0K8LcV8017553 (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 20 Jan 2016 00:21:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from [128.224.162.169] (128.224.162.169) by ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.248.2; Wed, 20 Jan 2016 00:21:38 -0800 To: Richard Purdie , References: <1453267659-18756-1-git-send-email-jian.liu@windriver.com> <1453276340.27999.141.camel@linuxfoundation.org> From: Jian Liu Message-ID: <569F43C8.3090800@windriver.com> Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 16:22:32 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1453276340.27999.141.camel@linuxfoundation.org> X-Originating-IP: [128.224.162.169] Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel-devsrc: Fix backward compaibilty X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 08:21:39 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 2016年01月20日 15:52, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Wed, 2016-01-20 at 13:27 +0800, Jian Liu wrote: >> kernel-dev is replaced by kernel-devsrc > No, its not. > >> , which breaks >> backward compaibilty. >> -- add alias for kernel-devsrc >> -- kernel-devsrc provides the kernel-dev. >> -- remove kernel-dev from the sub-packages of linux-windriver > kernel-dev is useful for things like profiling tools where you need > things like system.Map or the kernel configuration without source code. > > If you need the "full" source, you can use kernel-devsrc. > > I'm not sure we want to remove kernel-dev given it does have a use? Ok. I see. Thanks Richard. > > Cheers, > > Richard >