From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail1.windriver.com (mail1.windriver.com [147.11.146.13]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 356FF605BA for ; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 01:30:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hca.corp.ad.wrs.com [147.11.189.40]) by mail1.windriver.com (8.15.2/8.15.1) with ESMTPS id u0L1U34Q027995 (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 20 Jan 2016 17:30:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from [128.224.162.155] (128.224.162.155) by ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.40) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.248.2; Wed, 20 Jan 2016 17:30:03 -0800 To: Richard Purdie , Dengke Du References: <2a8d19d4ef60a323c8770722ec7f60811ced53ca.1453281406.git.dengke.du@windriver.com> <1453282408.27999.143.camel@linuxfoundation.org> From: Robert Yang Message-ID: <56A03499.2080703@windriver.com> Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 09:30:01 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1453282408.27999.143.camel@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] ncurses: drop the compatible option X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 01:30:05 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 01/20/2016 05:33 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Wed, 2016-01-20 at 04:30 -0500, Dengke Du wrote: >> drop the compatible option --with-abi-version=5 > > This says what the patch does, but not why. I had talked with Dengke, we have upgraded ncurses to 6, so remove --with-abi-version=5 seems better. He had tested world and sdk build based on oe-core. He will test it based on meta-openembedded. // Robert > > Why should we do this? Does any of our software depend on the v5 ABI? > How did you test this? > > Cheers, > > Richard >