From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.windriver.com (mail.windriver.com [147.11.1.11]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 978BD731C4 for ; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 22:58:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hca.corp.ad.wrs.com [147.11.189.40]) by mail.windriver.com (8.15.2/8.15.1) with ESMTPS id u0LMwkaI022294 (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for ; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 14:58:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from [172.25.44.8] (172.25.44.8) by ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.248.2; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 14:58:45 -0800 To: , References: <1453255296-6863-1-git-send-email-rongqing.li@windriver.com> From: Randy MacLeod Message-ID: <56A162A5.1000802@windriver.com> Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 17:58:45 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1453255296-6863-1-git-send-email-rongqing.li@windriver.com> X-Originating-IP: [172.25.44.8] Subject: Re: [PATCH] watchdog: enable systemd support X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 22:58:47 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 2016-01-19 09:01 PM, rongqing.li@windriver.com wrote: > 1. inherit systemd, and add two unit files which are from Fedora 23 Fine. > 2. auto load soft dog kernel module I haven't used a hardware watchdog for a while. Does softdog abstract that away so that it's hidden by the BSP? If not, can a user ditch the softdog for a hardware watchdog? Does that over-ride process need to be documented? -- # Randy MacLeod. SMTS, Linux, Wind River Direct: 613.963.1350 | 350 Terry Fox Drive, Suite 200, Ottawa, ON, Canada, K2K 2W5